Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,902 Year: 4,159/9,624 Month: 1,030/974 Week: 357/286 Day: 0/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Your Most Controversial Opinions!
dwise1
Member
Posts: 5952
Joined: 05-02-2006
Member Rating: 5.2


Message 8 of 300 (366980)
11-29-2006 8:30 PM


Evolution does not start and stop, but rather is continual.
Statis is an effect of evolutionary processes, as much as change is. So when a population is in statis, evolution is as much at work -- perhaps much more so -- as it is in a population that is changing.
Evolution is not so much processes and forces working on life, but rather it is a natural consequence of how individuals procreate within their populations. It's just simply how life works. Even if there were no such thing as evolution, populations would still evolve as they had and as they continue to do.
Edited by dwise1, : No reason given.

dwise1
Member
Posts: 5952
Joined: 05-02-2006
Member Rating: 5.2


Message 16 of 300 (367067)
11-30-2006 10:41 AM
Reply to: Message 14 by arachnophilia
11-30-2006 4:15 AM


i think the fact that humans are really stupid pack animals explains quite a lot about society as a whole.
No, we're not. We're pack-animal wanna-be's, which is even worse. Trying to emulate the life-style without all the requisite instincts in place.
no one person can do much of anything, if you really think about it. and 90% of the people out there can't even use the technology we've got, let alone explain how it works or construct something like it themselves.
Loved Asimov's take on that in the Foundation novels where the Foundation had started exporting technology as a religion. Say the right prayer and press the red button and it works.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 14 by arachnophilia, posted 11-30-2006 4:15 AM arachnophilia has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 250 by arachnophilia, posted 12-14-2006 10:28 PM dwise1 has not replied

dwise1
Member
Posts: 5952
Joined: 05-02-2006
Member Rating: 5.2


Message 41 of 300 (367244)
12-01-2006 10:35 AM
Reply to: Message 33 by crashfrog
11-30-2006 5:23 PM


But nothing is ever rejected in religion.
That's not true. Religion rejects anything that might even begin to appear to conflict with its followers' misunderstanding of their beliefs. Even (or especially) if it happens to be true.
Case in point: After viewing Da Vinci Code, I posed the question to my cabin-mate (who enjoyed the film) whether such a truth should be revealed and what effect it would have (I'm very pro-Truth, BTW). He was raised Seventh-Day Adventist. The conversation moved around to translations of the Bible (I pointed out the multiplicity of manuscripts that offer several variants of New Testament verses) and he expressed his absolute opposition to people "changing" the King James Bible, even though I kept pointing out that they didn't change the KJV, but rather were offering a modern English translation of the original Greek. His position was that the KJV took precedence over all other versions, including what the original Greek actually says.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 33 by crashfrog, posted 11-30-2006 5:23 PM crashfrog has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 42 by crashfrog, posted 12-01-2006 12:00 PM dwise1 has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024