Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 0/368 Day: 0/11 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   How Darwin caused atheism
subbie
Member (Idle past 1285 days)
Posts: 3509
Joined: 02-26-2006


Message 5 of 122 (601342)
01-19-2011 10:27 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by ApostateAbe
01-19-2011 7:37 PM


Atheism became more prevalent after Darwin announced his theory of evolution, therefore Darwin caused atheism. Can you say "post hoc ergo propter hoc?" I'm certainly not a sociologist, but I'd venture to guess that there were myriad social forces at work.
The ToE is exactly as important to atheism as are astronomy, geology, medicine, seismology, meteorology, psychiatry, and any other science that explained phenomena that were attributed to gods.
In one sense, atheism is completely independent of any science. Once one realizes that there is no evidence for any religious claims, and that attributing real world phenomena to gods doesn't really answer any questions anyway, religious fails regardless of whether science can answer the questions. Did the rise of science make this process easier? It makes sense to suppose that it did. But I'm not aware of any reason to elevate the ToE to the position you propose above all other sciences.

Ridicule is the only weapon which can be used against unintelligible propositions. -- Thomas Jefferson
We see monsters where science shows us windmills. -- Phat
It has always struck me as odd that fundies devote so much time and effort into trying to find a naturalistic explanation for their mythical flood, while looking for magical explanations for things that actually happened. -- Dr. Adequate
...creationists have a great way to detect fraud and it doesn't take 8 or 40 years or even a scientific degree to spot the fraud--'if it disagrees with the bible then it is wrong'.... -- archaeologist

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by ApostateAbe, posted 01-19-2011 7:37 PM ApostateAbe has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 12 by ApostateAbe, posted 01-19-2011 11:21 PM subbie has replied
 Message 74 by Dr Adequate, posted 01-21-2011 11:49 PM subbie has replied

  
subbie
Member (Idle past 1285 days)
Posts: 3509
Joined: 02-26-2006


Message 10 of 122 (601353)
01-19-2011 11:16 PM
Reply to: Message 8 by ApostateAbe
01-19-2011 11:07 PM


Re: good for the goose
I think the "E" side tends to push abiogenesis outside of the theory of evolution primarily because there is such a lack of data and so much speculation, but abioegenesis really is so intimately tied to the theory of evolution that it would be very misleading to separate them.
One is chemistry, the other is biology. The only ones who want to conflate them are those whose religions are threatened by them.

Ridicule is the only weapon which can be used against unintelligible propositions. -- Thomas Jefferson
We see monsters where science shows us windmills. -- Phat
It has always struck me as odd that fundies devote so much time and effort into trying to find a naturalistic explanation for their mythical flood, while looking for magical explanations for things that actually happened. -- Dr. Adequate
...creationists have a great way to detect fraud and it doesn't take 8 or 40 years or even a scientific degree to spot the fraud--'if it disagrees with the bible then it is wrong'.... -- archaeologist

This message is a reply to:
 Message 8 by ApostateAbe, posted 01-19-2011 11:07 PM ApostateAbe has not replied

  
subbie
Member (Idle past 1285 days)
Posts: 3509
Joined: 02-26-2006


Message 13 of 122 (601356)
01-19-2011 11:30 PM
Reply to: Message 12 by ApostateAbe
01-19-2011 11:21 PM


...but it was the theory of evolution that struck at the heart of religion and removed almost all scientific requirements for the gods.
Yes, you've made it clear what you think. Now all you need is some evidence. I'd love to see it.
I have mentioned some of my differences with the activist defenders of the ToE, and there is another difference which relates to this point. The assertion is sometimes made that the proposition of creationism or intelligent design must stand on its own, independent of the weaknesses of the theory of evolution. But, the way science is done in reality is to choose the explanation that explains the evidence the best. It is a system of competition. It is not a pass/fail system where there is no scientific theory if no theory scores well. Creationism really was accepted among the most qualified biologists before Darwin's theory of evolution (and for a short time after).
It's far from clear to me what this has to do with the point I made. In any event, the problem with religion in general, and creationism specifically, as far as explanations for the world is concerned, is that they don't explain anything. Even in a one horse race they lose, because they don't even get out of the gate. "Goddit and his ways are mysterious" isn't an explanation. It's throwing one's hands up in the air and assuming we'll never know. That's not an explanation, it's an excuse for not looking for an explanation.
Also, I'd love to hear what you consider to be an "activist defender of the ToE." I'm intrigued by the concept.

Ridicule is the only weapon which can be used against unintelligible propositions. -- Thomas Jefferson
We see monsters where science shows us windmills. -- Phat
It has always struck me as odd that fundies devote so much time and effort into trying to find a naturalistic explanation for their mythical flood, while looking for magical explanations for things that actually happened. -- Dr. Adequate
...creationists have a great way to detect fraud and it doesn't take 8 or 40 years or even a scientific degree to spot the fraud--'if it disagrees with the bible then it is wrong'.... -- archaeologist

This message is a reply to:
 Message 12 by ApostateAbe, posted 01-19-2011 11:21 PM ApostateAbe has not replied

  
subbie
Member (Idle past 1285 days)
Posts: 3509
Joined: 02-26-2006


Message 47 of 122 (601453)
01-20-2011 4:09 PM
Reply to: Message 34 by ApostateAbe
01-20-2011 12:09 PM


OK, would you say that the combined science of Newton, Kepler, Galileo, Copernicus, Lyell Darwin and so on provided a good accumulation of explanatory science that essentially eliminated the need for God?
It struck down the most popular argument for God, and there was hardly anything left to be explained by God.
The problem of course, which you have so far ignored, is that gods don't explain any of those things, and gods aren't needed because of them. Gods were conceived because of human inability to explain things they didn't understand, that much is true. But it doesn't follow from that that gods actually explained the things they were conceived to explain.
Obviously, the ToE doesn't strike down the most popular argument for gods, since most people who believe in gods also understand that evidence supports the ToE.
Also, I'm still waiting to hear what you consider an "activist defender of the ToE."

Ridicule is the only weapon which can be used against unintelligible propositions. -- Thomas Jefferson
We see monsters where science shows us windmills. -- Phat
It has always struck me as odd that fundies devote so much time and effort into trying to find a naturalistic explanation for their mythical flood, while looking for magical explanations for things that actually happened. -- Dr. Adequate
...creationists have a great way to detect fraud and it doesn't take 8 or 40 years or even a scientific degree to spot the fraud--'if it disagrees with the bible then it is wrong'.... -- archaeologist

This message is a reply to:
 Message 34 by ApostateAbe, posted 01-20-2011 12:09 PM ApostateAbe has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 48 by ApostateAbe, posted 01-20-2011 8:46 PM subbie has replied

  
subbie
Member (Idle past 1285 days)
Posts: 3509
Joined: 02-26-2006


Message 52 of 122 (601497)
01-20-2011 9:31 PM
Reply to: Message 48 by ApostateAbe
01-20-2011 8:46 PM


Maybe what you mean to say....
I'm one of those odd ducks who says what he means. Gods don't explain anything. As I described above, "Goddit" isn't an explanation, it's an excuse for not looking for an explanation.
The most popular argument for God remains the teleological argument (intelligent design) as it applies to life....
You need to square that with the fact that most religious people acknowledge that the ToE is the best explanation for life on this planet.
I think you will find that these discussions would progress faster if you actually respond to the points others make rather than simply quoting them, then reasserting the same error that they are trying to correct. Just a thought.
...decisions of religious belief among the wider population are only in small part influenced by the best explanations of science.
And thus, you have refuted your own point. Well done.

Ridicule is the only weapon which can be used against unintelligible propositions. -- Thomas Jefferson
We see monsters where science shows us windmills. -- Phat
It has always struck me as odd that fundies devote so much time and effort into trying to find a naturalistic explanation for their mythical flood, while looking for magical explanations for things that actually happened. -- Dr. Adequate
...creationists have a great way to detect fraud and it doesn't take 8 or 40 years or even a scientific degree to spot the fraud--'if it disagrees with the bible then it is wrong'.... -- archaeologist

This message is a reply to:
 Message 48 by ApostateAbe, posted 01-20-2011 8:46 PM ApostateAbe has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 56 by Taq, posted 01-20-2011 9:57 PM subbie has seen this message but not replied
 Message 59 by ApostateAbe, posted 01-20-2011 10:08 PM subbie has replied

  
subbie
Member (Idle past 1285 days)
Posts: 3509
Joined: 02-26-2006


Message 61 of 122 (601508)
01-20-2011 10:10 PM
Reply to: Message 59 by ApostateAbe
01-20-2011 10:08 PM


Since you've refuted your own thesis, I'd expect you are done with everyone. But I guess I can live with the fact that you have no real response to what I'm saying.

Ridicule is the only weapon which can be used against unintelligible propositions. -- Thomas Jefferson
We see monsters where science shows us windmills. -- Phat
It has always struck me as odd that fundies devote so much time and effort into trying to find a naturalistic explanation for their mythical flood, while looking for magical explanations for things that actually happened. -- Dr. Adequate
...creationists have a great way to detect fraud and it doesn't take 8 or 40 years or even a scientific degree to spot the fraud--'if it disagrees with the bible then it is wrong'.... -- archaeologist

This message is a reply to:
 Message 59 by ApostateAbe, posted 01-20-2011 10:08 PM ApostateAbe has not replied

  
subbie
Member (Idle past 1285 days)
Posts: 3509
Joined: 02-26-2006


Message 75 of 122 (601607)
01-22-2011 12:01 AM
Reply to: Message 74 by Dr Adequate
01-21-2011 11:49 PM


Sorry, not following you. Can you expand or clarify?

Ridicule is the only weapon which can be used against unintelligible propositions. -- Thomas Jefferson
We see monsters where science shows us windmills. -- Phat
It has always struck me as odd that fundies devote so much time and effort into trying to find a naturalistic explanation for their mythical flood, while looking for magical explanations for things that actually happened. -- Dr. Adequate
...creationists have a great way to detect fraud and it doesn't take 8 or 40 years or even a scientific degree to spot the fraud--'if it disagrees with the bible then it is wrong'.... -- archaeologist

This message is a reply to:
 Message 74 by Dr Adequate, posted 01-21-2011 11:49 PM Dr Adequate has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 76 by Dr Adequate, posted 01-22-2011 12:13 AM subbie has seen this message but not replied

  
subbie
Member (Idle past 1285 days)
Posts: 3509
Joined: 02-26-2006


Message 91 of 122 (601751)
01-23-2011 9:45 PM
Reply to: Message 89 by petrophysics1
01-23-2011 8:41 PM


Re: You What?
WTF? Are you on the rag or something?

Ridicule is the only weapon which can be used against unintelligible propositions. -- Thomas Jefferson
We see monsters where science shows us windmills. -- Phat
It has always struck me as odd that fundies devote so much time and effort into trying to find a naturalistic explanation for their mythical flood, while looking for magical explanations for things that actually happened. -- Dr. Adequate
...creationists have a great way to detect fraud and it doesn't take 8 or 40 years or even a scientific degree to spot the fraud--'if it disagrees with the bible then it is wrong'.... -- archaeologist

This message is a reply to:
 Message 89 by petrophysics1, posted 01-23-2011 8:41 PM petrophysics1 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 94 by petrophysics1, posted 01-23-2011 10:08 PM subbie has replied

  
subbie
Member (Idle past 1285 days)
Posts: 3509
Joined: 02-26-2006


Message 95 of 122 (601759)
01-23-2011 10:23 PM
Reply to: Message 94 by petrophysics1
01-23-2011 10:08 PM


Re: You What?
The way you're going on, it really sounds like someone not only peed in your Wheaties, but they took a dump as well. Dude, chill out. If you have something rational to say, it's a lot more likely to be taken seriously if you sound rational. I kinda doubt you have anything rational to say, but try to calm down and give it another shot. Who knows, I've been wrong before.
{AbE} I have no doubt that you know things I don't. I'm equally certain I know things you don't. We could compare lists, but that seems silly.
I do strongly suspect that you are wrong about a lot more things than I am, but I'm not interested enough in the question to actually inquire.
Edited by subbie, : As noted

Ridicule is the only weapon which can be used against unintelligible propositions. -- Thomas Jefferson
We see monsters where science shows us windmills. -- Phat
It has always struck me as odd that fundies devote so much time and effort into trying to find a naturalistic explanation for their mythical flood, while looking for magical explanations for things that actually happened. -- Dr. Adequate
...creationists have a great way to detect fraud and it doesn't take 8 or 40 years or even a scientific degree to spot the fraud--'if it disagrees with the bible then it is wrong'.... -- archaeologist

This message is a reply to:
 Message 94 by petrophysics1, posted 01-23-2011 10:08 PM petrophysics1 has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 98 by jar, posted 01-23-2011 10:51 PM subbie has seen this message but not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024