The only way you can read it and have it make any sense is that it is talking about some future person being born to a woman who hasn't had a child and the child will grow up after the kings have been destroyed.
It certainly doesn't make sense to interpret it as saying that the kings will be destroyed before the child is even born.
It says the child is born, eats good stuff, and before he grows up the kings will be destroyed.
It only makes sense that the child is born before the kings are destroyed.
And its not an uncommon thing. Take a look at the next chapter:
quote:
Isa 8
1 The Lord said to me, Take a large scroll and write on it with an ordinary pen: Maher-Shalal-Hash-Baz.
2 So I called in Uriah the priest and Zechariah son of Jeberekiah as reliable witnesses for me.
3 Then I made love to the prophetess, and she conceived and gave birth to a son. And the Lord said to me, Name him Maher-Shalal-Hash-Baz.
4 For before the boy knows how to say ‘My father’ or ‘My mother,’ the wealth of Damascus and the plunder of Samaria will be carried off by the king of Assyria.
Same deal. A kid will be born, but before he grows up X will happen. It doesn't make sense for that to be saying that it will happen before the kid is even born.
Edited by Catholic Scientist, : No reason given.