Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,901 Year: 4,158/9,624 Month: 1,029/974 Week: 356/286 Day: 12/65 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The evidence for design and a designer - AS OF 10/27, SUMMARY MESSAGES ONLY
jar
Member (Idle past 423 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 571 of 648 (588460)
10-25-2010 7:44 PM
Reply to: Message 570 by Dawn Bertot
10-25-2010 7:40 PM


Dawn Bertot writes:
not necessarily what is, "in my mind", but what logic and physical properties will allow
What physical properties of the designer allow it to have any worth or relevance?

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 570 by Dawn Bertot, posted 10-25-2010 7:40 PM Dawn Bertot has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 573 by Dawn Bertot, posted 10-25-2010 8:08 PM jar has replied

jar
Member (Idle past 423 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 575 of 648 (588466)
10-25-2010 8:12 PM
Reply to: Message 573 by Dawn Bertot
10-25-2010 8:08 PM


physical properties of the designer.
Dawn Bertot writes:
jar writes:
What physical properties of the designer allow it to have any worth or relevance?
One might ask the same of Jar's existence
Your a funny guy jar jar, you just cant stay on point can you. You should have said what relevance or worth does reality have in determining a logical approach and conclusion concerning design. what will it allow as far as evidnece goes
But I did not ask about jar's existence.
You had said:
Dawn Bertot writes:
not necessarily what is, "in my mind", but what logic and physical properties will allow
And so I asked "What physical properties of the designer allow it to have any worth or relevance?"

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 573 by Dawn Bertot, posted 10-25-2010 8:08 PM Dawn Bertot has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 577 by Dawn Bertot, posted 10-25-2010 8:26 PM jar has replied

jar
Member (Idle past 423 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 578 of 648 (588471)
10-25-2010 8:35 PM
Reply to: Message 577 by Dawn Bertot
10-25-2010 8:26 PM


Re: physical properties of the designer.
I think this time you said:
Dawn Bertot writes:
Dawn Bertot writes:
not necessarily what is, "in my mind", but what logic and physical properties will allow
jar writes
And so I asked "What physical properties of the designer allow it to have any worth or relevance?"
if you read my comment in its context, it will expalin it to your satisfaction
Your a funny guy Jar a funny guy. your last name is not Binks is it
now if you will excuse me, I have to see who my Vikings are playing next week, I think Bret was texting during the game last night, even while he was on the field, that could have been why we lost. its hard to text and throw a ball at the same time. I just dont see how he does it without us seeing the phone in his hands
Dawn Bertot
However I still do not understand and I'm not satisfied.
"What physical properties of the designer allow it to have any worth or relevance?"
What physical properties of the designer allow it to have any effect, relevance or influence in life we see?
Is the answer supposed to be in the following reply found in Message 573?
quote:
jar writes:
What physical properties of the designer allow it to have any worth or relevance?
One might ask the same of Jar's existence
Your a funny guy jar jar, you just cant stay on point can you. You should have said what relevance or worth does reality have in determining a logical approach and conclusion concerning design. what will it allow as far as evidnece goes
Dawn Bertot

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 577 by Dawn Bertot, posted 10-25-2010 8:26 PM Dawn Bertot has not replied

jar
Member (Idle past 423 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 605 of 648 (588596)
10-26-2010 6:05 PM
Reply to: Message 593 by Dawn Bertot
10-26-2010 4:46 PM


Dawn was not sunrise but simply the glow of ignorance.
Dawn Bertot writes:
i believe those are the same people that are still here getting free things from the government correct. i think the economy will go extinct before they do. I have nothing against indians, I just dont think people should get things free because thier ancestors were involved in this or that
By that reasoning I should be in jail because of Musalini, if that is how you spell his name. enough is enough, get over it and move on
While those indians back then suffered great indignities, those today are just riding the gravy train
If you include having you land stolen, your sacred sites desecrated, your people confined to reservations and constant discrimination riding the gravy train then you might have a point. But so far you are simply showing that you know as little about history or the US today as you do about science, reason, logic or honesty.
And you still have not explained the two questions asked.
"What physical properties of the designer allow it to have any worth or relevance?"
"What physical properties of the designer allow it to have any effect, relevance or influence in life we see?"

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 593 by Dawn Bertot, posted 10-26-2010 4:46 PM Dawn Bertot has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 609 by Dawn Bertot, posted 10-26-2010 11:15 PM jar has replied

jar
Member (Idle past 423 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 613 of 648 (588630)
10-26-2010 11:34 PM
Reply to: Message 609 by Dawn Bertot
10-26-2010 11:15 PM


Re: Dawn was not sunrise but simply the glow of ignorance.
And once again, not only did you not address the point I made about your attempt to misdirect the discussion, you refused to answer the two questions that are on topic.
"What physical properties of the designer allow it to have any worth or relevance?"
"What physical properties of the designer allow it to have any effect, relevance or influence in life we see?"

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 609 by Dawn Bertot, posted 10-26-2010 11:15 PM Dawn Bertot has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 615 by Dawn Bertot, posted 10-26-2010 11:40 PM jar has replied

jar
Member (Idle past 423 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 616 of 648 (588634)
10-26-2010 11:47 PM
Reply to: Message 615 by Dawn Bertot
10-26-2010 11:40 PM


Re: Dawn was not sunrise but simply the glow of ignorance.
And you once again simply refuse to address the issue.
You said:
Dawn Bertot writes:
not necessarily what is, "in my mind", but what logic and physical properties will allow
You said there were physical properties related to the designer.
So the questions remain.
"What physical properties of the designer allow it to have any worth or relevance?"
"What physical properties of the designer allow it to have any effect, relevance or influence in life we see?"

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 615 by Dawn Bertot, posted 10-26-2010 11:40 PM Dawn Bertot has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 625 by Dawn Bertot, posted 10-27-2010 9:20 AM jar has not replied

jar
Member (Idle past 423 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 626 of 648 (588668)
10-27-2010 9:42 AM


It doesn't matter if there was a Designer!
So far absolutely no one has shown any reason why even if there was a designer, it would have any merit or worth beyond a historical footnote or in the case of Product Liability suits.
Even if true, it tells us nothing about how the world we see around us developed. We still need to figure out how things happened, what the model is, and for that, science so far has been the only process that has been shown to work.

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024