Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 66 (9164 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,471 Year: 3,728/9,624 Month: 599/974 Week: 212/276 Day: 52/34 Hour: 2/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The evidence for design and a designer - AS OF 10/27, SUMMARY MESSAGES ONLY
subbie
Member (Idle past 1277 days)
Posts: 3509
Joined: 02-26-2006


Message 155 of 648 (587337)
10-18-2010 1:07 PM
Reply to: Message 154 by Panda
10-18-2010 11:01 AM


My mea culpa
I strongly suspect that the problem isn't a language one but a comprehension one. Dawn seems to have a unique way of thinking that, as far as I can tell, is not shared by any other person. His posts are largely incomprehensible by just about everyone here. And all available evidence suggests that he does not really understand what other people are saying. I'm afraid that I must take no small measure of responsibility for his presence here.
I ran into him at a PBS discussion board, related to the Kitzmiller shenanigans if memory serves, and invited him to EvC. Had I fully appreciated the depth of his inability to constructively engage in reasoned debate, I likely would not have invited him. Ah well, hindsight is 20/20.

Ridicule is the only weapon which can be used against unintelligible propositions. -- Thomas Jefferson
We see monsters where science shows us windmills. -- Phat
It has always struck me as odd that fundies devote so much time and effort into trying to find a naturalistic explanation for their mythical flood, while looking for magical explanations for things that actually happened. -- Dr. Adequate
...creationists have a great way to detect fraud and it doesn't take 8 or 40 years or even a scientific degree to spot the fraud--'if it disagrees with the bible then it is wrong'.... -- archaeologist

This message is a reply to:
 Message 154 by Panda, posted 10-18-2010 11:01 AM Panda has seen this message but not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 168 by Dawn Bertot, posted 10-18-2010 5:17 PM subbie has replied

subbie
Member (Idle past 1277 days)
Posts: 3509
Joined: 02-26-2006


Message 170 of 648 (587396)
10-18-2010 5:26 PM
Reply to: Message 168 by Dawn Bertot
10-18-2010 5:17 PM


Re: My mea culpa
I've previously tried to engage you in a battle of wits on the field of reason and found you completely unarmed. I see no reason to repeat the exercise in futility.
At a minimum, you'd need to learn basic punctuation skills before I'd even venture an attempt.

Ridicule is the only weapon which can be used against unintelligible propositions. -- Thomas Jefferson
We see monsters where science shows us windmills. -- Phat
It has always struck me as odd that fundies devote so much time and effort into trying to find a naturalistic explanation for their mythical flood, while looking for magical explanations for things that actually happened. -- Dr. Adequate
...creationists have a great way to detect fraud and it doesn't take 8 or 40 years or even a scientific degree to spot the fraud--'if it disagrees with the bible then it is wrong'.... -- archaeologist

This message is a reply to:
 Message 168 by Dawn Bertot, posted 10-18-2010 5:17 PM Dawn Bertot has not replied

subbie
Member (Idle past 1277 days)
Posts: 3509
Joined: 02-26-2006


Message 374 of 648 (587931)
10-21-2010 1:35 PM
Reply to: Message 357 by Just being real
10-21-2010 11:34 AM


Evolution is nothing more than naturally occuring trial and error
Here
is an example of a specific antenna arrangement that was not designed. NASA settled on this arrangement through the process of an evolutionary algorithm where different arrangements were tested to see which gave the best results, then those were combined randomly to arrive at new arrangements which were tested to see which gave the best results which were then combined randomly, etc.
Let me try to put it into simpler terms. Are you familiar with the term "trial and error?" In essence, it's someone trying to get to a solution testing a number of different options until he stumbles upon the one that works best. No intelligence need go into the process; simple random examination of various possibilities will eventually arrive at a workable solution. That's evolution in a nutshell. Billions upon billions of different organisms with billions upon billions of different combinations over millions upon millions of years, resulting in nature as we see it today. No need for any intelligent input of any sort.
To get an improvement you have to have several correlated changes all take place at the same time and in just the right places. In other words you have to have much more than 150 coins all land on their heads at once in each and every step of the process of evolution.
This is simply not true. All that is necessary for evolution to proceed is for one small change to take place that gives one individual a competitive advantage over others. That individual will produce more offspring, and more of its genetic information will appear is succeeding generations. It really is just that simple. If you disagree, please explain why.

Ridicule is the only weapon which can be used against unintelligible propositions. -- Thomas Jefferson
We see monsters where science shows us windmills. -- Phat
It has always struck me as odd that fundies devote so much time and effort into trying to find a naturalistic explanation for their mythical flood, while looking for magical explanations for things that actually happened. -- Dr. Adequate
...creationists have a great way to detect fraud and it doesn't take 8 or 40 years or even a scientific degree to spot the fraud--'if it disagrees with the bible then it is wrong'.... -- archaeologist

This message is a reply to:
 Message 357 by Just being real, posted 10-21-2010 11:34 AM Just being real has not replied

subbie
Member (Idle past 1277 days)
Posts: 3509
Joined: 02-26-2006


Message 447 of 648 (588103)
10-22-2010 9:34 AM
Reply to: Message 424 by dennis780
10-22-2010 5:43 AM


Is the wire arrangement in this antenna
complex?

Ridicule is the only weapon which can be used against unintelligible propositions. -- Thomas Jefferson
We see monsters where science shows us windmills. -- Phat
It has always struck me as odd that fundies devote so much time and effort into trying to find a naturalistic explanation for their mythical flood, while looking for magical explanations for things that actually happened. -- Dr. Adequate
...creationists have a great way to detect fraud and it doesn't take 8 or 40 years or even a scientific degree to spot the fraud--'if it disagrees with the bible then it is wrong'.... -- archaeologist

This message is a reply to:
 Message 424 by dennis780, posted 10-22-2010 5:43 AM dennis780 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 487 by dennis780, posted 10-22-2010 11:28 PM subbie has replied

subbie
Member (Idle past 1277 days)
Posts: 3509
Joined: 02-26-2006


Message 448 of 648 (588104)
10-22-2010 9:37 AM
Reply to: Message 415 by Just being real
10-22-2010 5:13 AM


What sets "designed" complexity apart from these kinds of structures, is purpose or (specificity).
Does the wire arrangement in this antenna
have what you call purpose or specificity?

Ridicule is the only weapon which can be used against unintelligible propositions. -- Thomas Jefferson
We see monsters where science shows us windmills. -- Phat
It has always struck me as odd that fundies devote so much time and effort into trying to find a naturalistic explanation for their mythical flood, while looking for magical explanations for things that actually happened. -- Dr. Adequate
...creationists have a great way to detect fraud and it doesn't take 8 or 40 years or even a scientific degree to spot the fraud--'if it disagrees with the bible then it is wrong'.... -- archaeologist

This message is a reply to:
 Message 415 by Just being real, posted 10-22-2010 5:13 AM Just being real has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 509 by Just being real, posted 10-23-2010 4:29 AM subbie has replied

subbie
Member (Idle past 1277 days)
Posts: 3509
Joined: 02-26-2006


Message 491 of 648 (588228)
10-22-2010 11:48 PM
Reply to: Message 487 by dennis780
10-22-2010 11:28 PM


Likely to be formed in nature? No.
Function and purpose? Yes.
Co-operation with other parts to function? Yes.
Designed.
A wonderful response. Clear, concise, and consistent with the positions you've previously laid out. I applaud your effort.
Unfortunately, your conclusion is incorrect. The antenna arrangement was not designed. It was a result of random changes.

Ridicule is the only weapon which can be used against unintelligible propositions. -- Thomas Jefferson
We see monsters where science shows us windmills. -- Phat
It has always struck me as odd that fundies devote so much time and effort into trying to find a naturalistic explanation for their mythical flood, while looking for magical explanations for things that actually happened. -- Dr. Adequate
...creationists have a great way to detect fraud and it doesn't take 8 or 40 years or even a scientific degree to spot the fraud--'if it disagrees with the bible then it is wrong'.... -- archaeologist

This message is a reply to:
 Message 487 by dennis780, posted 10-22-2010 11:28 PM dennis780 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 496 by dennis780, posted 10-23-2010 12:16 AM subbie has replied

subbie
Member (Idle past 1277 days)
Posts: 3509
Joined: 02-26-2006


Message 497 of 648 (588234)
10-23-2010 12:20 AM
Reply to: Message 496 by dennis780
10-23-2010 12:16 AM


Perfect. This is yet a prime example of how someone can misinterpret physical information to draw incorrect conclusions. In order to make a intelligent assumption, I would have gained more insight by asking a mechanical engineer about the antenna, and it's proper shape and function. More information means more accurate conclusion. As science advances, we understand even once thought simple organisms are amazingly complex, and thus tilts evidence for design.
I'm sorry, but I have no idea what point you are making.

Ridicule is the only weapon which can be used against unintelligible propositions. -- Thomas Jefferson
We see monsters where science shows us windmills. -- Phat
It has always struck me as odd that fundies devote so much time and effort into trying to find a naturalistic explanation for their mythical flood, while looking for magical explanations for things that actually happened. -- Dr. Adequate
...creationists have a great way to detect fraud and it doesn't take 8 or 40 years or even a scientific degree to spot the fraud--'if it disagrees with the bible then it is wrong'.... -- archaeologist

This message is a reply to:
 Message 496 by dennis780, posted 10-23-2010 12:16 AM dennis780 has not replied

subbie
Member (Idle past 1277 days)
Posts: 3509
Joined: 02-26-2006


Message 525 of 648 (588273)
10-23-2010 10:46 AM
Reply to: Message 509 by Just being real
10-23-2010 4:29 AM


So then you agree that purpose or specificity can be created by random processes?

Ridicule is the only weapon which can be used against unintelligible propositions. -- Thomas Jefferson
We see monsters where science shows us windmills. -- Phat
It has always struck me as odd that fundies devote so much time and effort into trying to find a naturalistic explanation for their mythical flood, while looking for magical explanations for things that actually happened. -- Dr. Adequate
...creationists have a great way to detect fraud and it doesn't take 8 or 40 years or even a scientific degree to spot the fraud--'if it disagrees with the bible then it is wrong'.... -- archaeologist

This message is a reply to:
 Message 509 by Just being real, posted 10-23-2010 4:29 AM Just being real has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024