|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total) |
| |
ChatGPT | |
Total: 916,916 Year: 4,173/9,624 Month: 1,044/974 Week: 3/368 Day: 3/11 Hour: 0/0 |
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: What gives God the right to be "holy"? | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
cavediver Member (Idle past 3674 days) Posts: 4129 From: UK Joined: |
It is a regular occurance in debates here at EvC that non-Christians quiz Christians on the reasons that God has for hell. The reasons often track back to this concept of God being holy - here's some recent quotes by Dr Sing:
{God} needed someone holy, as holy as himself to pay for you sins. The price that God set for sin was holy blood So holy is the God of the Bible that He will not tolerate even a single sin What we have here is an "ultimate" conciousness that decides that it is "holy". It gives its newly created beings free-will, and some rules. A rule gets broken, and because this ultimate being has decided that it is "holy" and rule-breaking is something that cannot be tolerated, its entire creation will suffer. Not content with just wiping out his creation for this perceived slight against its own self-determined holiness, it consigns A&E and all of their descendents to ETERNAL SUFFERING... And this just because God hsa decided that it is holy, and cannot abide rule-breaking. The fact is that God didn't suddenly discover itself holy - if it wants to take on such a mantle, then fair enough, but it is a choice. And it is this choice that leads to hell and eternal suffering. Faith and Belief please...
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
cavediver Member (Idle past 3674 days) Posts: 4129 From: UK Joined: |
How do I know that your challenges are not simply employments of the same evil anti-God forces ? Uh-uh, I went too far... ah well, tiz a fair cop - ya got me - tiz me, Old Nick, up to me'old tricks. Now, who wants a life of wine, women -or men if you so prefer - and debauchery? Mephisto, have you got that quill?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
cavediver Member (Idle past 3674 days) Posts: 4129 From: UK Joined: |
I think the answer would be that God didn't decide to be holy, but that he iss holy. Is this a necessary requirement of the nature of the monotheistic creator deity? If yes, then clearly God cannot be omnipotent. If no, then God has been subject to some decision - if it didn't come from himself, then again, he is not omnipotent.
If it really was a choice on his part to send us there, why would he ever have to become a man, and suffer and be humiliated and ultimately die. It makes no sense at all... Now I think we are getting somewhere
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
cavediver Member (Idle past 3674 days) Posts: 4129 From: UK Joined: |
From what does God purchase man? Man has fallen under the law of God. Originally the created man was not in the custody of the law of God. When man became united with the enemy of God he came under the custody of God's law. I'm sorry, Jaywill, but I had decades of peddling this pseudo-theological drivel, trying to convince myself that it actually makes some kind sense. In this thread I am trying to look at why an ultimate creator deity would have any interest in a "law of God", concepts such as "puchasing" and "custody", having an "enemy of God", etc. This is all just so much anthropomorphisation, and primarily regi-pomorphisation of the concept of deity that it just stinks of God as a construct of man. This thread is about tearing down the obfuscation of your theological babble to reveal it for the nonsense it is - and believe me, I believed the exact same things you do for a great long time. Edited by cavediver, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
cavediver Member (Idle past 3674 days) Posts: 4129 From: UK Joined: |
I'm going to argue with you. OH NO YOU'RE NOT - (he's behind you!) Sorry, just getting into the season
Holiness is merely a measure of proximity to Yahweh. I agree completely, but I was talking of the Christian god, not Yahweh. But I don't mind conflating the two for the sake of this post Obviously, the Christian view of holiness has evolved and been co-opted (corrupted?) from the Judaistic. As you say, Yahweh required separation from the unclean and profane. But not from sin, interestingly. In the Garden, Yahweh is quite happily quizzing A&E face-to-face regarding their fall from grace. The question remains, why does Yahweh require such separation? And do all possible monotheistic creator deities come to the same conclusions regarding the need to be separated from shellfish?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
cavediver Member (Idle past 3674 days) Posts: 4129 From: UK Joined: |
One reason might be the conviction that God expressing his wrath against that which is evil is a good thing. So, the "evil" we have is disobeying daddy's instructions and eating an "apple", and the wrath we have is eternal torment and suffering for billions of sentient creatures. This certainly makes me associate Hitler, Pot, Stalin, etc with God's wrath far more than with any "evil" carried out by A&E.
Your knowing this already, yet partaking in the slur, is indicative of God-hatred - something predicted as forming the nature of the lost. I would find it very difficult to hate a concept so poorly and ill-defined as the Christian god. I hate God no more than I hate the UFOs I used to desperately believe in as a child. I'm just more annoyed at myself for carrying one of those beliefs well past its sell-by date.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
cavediver Member (Idle past 3674 days) Posts: 4129 From: UK Joined: |
the breaking of natural laws has disasterous consequences as im sure you'd agree. For loose interpretations of the word 'breaking', yes I agree.
God has made all the laws in the universe, they are there and we must abide by them... So it is God's choice that these laws exist, and that breaking them has disastrous consequences? Again I ask, why did he choose this. If he had no choice, he is hardly omnipotent and he seems subject to the 'deep magic'. If he choose to make the world this way, then responsibility falls to his choices.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
cavediver Member (Idle past 3674 days) Posts: 4129 From: UK Joined: |
Now remove it from reality, take it away and tell me what would happen if it did not exist. a) If there is no omnipotent creator deity - you can't take it away - all are contingent on each other in our reality b) If there is an omnipotent creator deity - whatever he wants to happen
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
cavediver Member (Idle past 3674 days) Posts: 4129 From: UK Joined: |
but the physical universe is not in his world and it only exists because of the laws that make physical matter possible. Who designed the physical world to be the way it is? Who designed it so that when you fall over, there's a chance you will break your neck and spend the rest of your life paralysed?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
cavediver Member (Idle past 3674 days) Posts: 4129 From: UK Joined:
|
it matters not who made the physical world On the contrary, I think it lies at the heart of the matter, especially if you are claiming that sin and the fall are part of this physical world. In Christian theology, people are going to hell because of the way that God set things up. That's all that matters.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
cavediver Member (Idle past 3674 days) Posts: 4129 From: UK Joined: |
you keep steering away from our own personal responsibility toward laws. Yep, because I'm trying to redress the balance. We're always told how we failed God's perfect standard, and how we must pay the price. Preached it myself a thousand times. What I am asking is why should God have a perfect standard? And why should we be judged against it? Eve exercised her freewill and the rest of humanity is paying the price for it. But it was God's afront to her choice that is the reason behind the fall and the suffering.
Now this hell business is nothing to do with God. Its not a place where conscious people exist...its the grave of mankind. Its the place of inactivity...its the place of the dead. Oh, I'm sorry Peg. I was talking about Christian beliefs. You're a JW - you're not Christian - you are a deceit sent by Satan. Didn't you know? Do you know how many times I have preached against you guys - how many conferences I have attended learning how to beat down the satanic influence of the major cults (JWs, Mormons, Christian Scientists, Scientologists, Christadelphians, Armstrongists) It's very very odd being on the outside now, looking back in. It took me to stop being a Christian to recognise you as a Christian. It's a strange world... Edited by cavediver, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
cavediver Member (Idle past 3674 days) Posts: 4129 From: UK Joined: |
You may try to boast how your have been there and done that. My Christian life spanning more than twenty years gave me many pleasurable times and gave me the best wife I could hope to have, but as a self-confessed acadmeic and intellectual I do not boast at being deluded for the larger part of my life
Where did you get that concept of "falling from grace" if not directly from Galatians. But OH NO! you're steering far, far away from that New Testament "drivel". You're gloriously free from the New Testament, Right ? Err, what?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
cavediver Member (Idle past 3674 days) Posts: 4129 From: UK Joined: |
In other words, his wrath formed the consequences promised Yep, but the point of this thread is - why is there any wrath to begin with?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
cavediver Member (Idle past 3674 days) Posts: 4129 From: UK Joined: |
..oh, and because he hates evil too. Where "evil" is anything that falls short of the 100% purity insisted by the evangelical Christian god. "evil" is being conned into eating an apple, "evil" is my 9 yr old having to be told three times to tidy his room, "evil" is me telling my wife that I'll be home in five minutes, knowing full well that by the time I have finished my pint, it will be ten minutes, "evil" is telling the Nazi at the door that there's no Jews upstairs. You are being exceptionally disingenuous here Iano, using this word EVIL, when you know full well that we are talking about an unattainable expectation - I have lived and breathed your Gospel for far far longer than you have, and know it rather well... What makes the evangelical Christian god so abhorrent is his 100% expectation - an expectation that results in billions of souls screaming in agony in hell. It is a nonsense of a concept. The salvation offered by Jesus is merely a way of escaping the utterly unreasonable demands of a tyrrant. The evangelical Christian god is not good in any sane view of the word - he is simply a bastardisation of far too many contradictory concepts, and the immense cracks in his definition are shoddily plastered over with pseudo-theological christo-babble, as we see in abundance from Jaywill, and you to some extent (and from me in the past). Edited by cavediver, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
cavediver Member (Idle past 3674 days) Posts: 4129 From: UK Joined: |
Apologies - I was severely distracted from this thread.
cavediver writes: The evangelical Christian god is not good in any sane view of the word - he is simply a bastardisation of far too many contradictory concepts, and the immense cracks in his definition are shoddily plastered over with pseudo-theological christo-babble The peanut gallery might be impressed but you've not provided much substance to the "any sane view" view. Ok, let's look at the sane view...
Suffice for us to agree that the merest hint of unkindness, selfishness, envy, malice... is "evil". Most sane folk understand that evil is objectionable. Most sane folk have no problem with folk receiving the consequences of choice. I would venture to guess that most sane folks do not think that the MEREST HINT of unkindness, selfishness, envy, malice is sufficient to warrant the consequence of ETERNAL SUFFERING IN HELL. It is quite clear from Genesis that god had no problem being in the vicinity of Adam & Eve post-fall - this whole concept of god's required separation, holiness, and inability to be associated with sin has grown in the telling, until we arrive at the modern flaw-ridden and self-contradictory picture you paint.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024