Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,911 Year: 4,168/9,624 Month: 1,039/974 Week: 366/286 Day: 9/13 Hour: 1/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   God: Knowable or not Knowable?
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 107 of 216 (438412)
12-04-2007 1:21 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Jon
11-21-2007 4:04 PM


Omni = any
Jon,
If god is omnipotent then he has the power to make someone know him. QED.
No?

To empathise with God would require us to see the world the way God does.
I think this premise is false, but it doesn't really matter.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Jon, posted 11-21-2007 4:04 PM Jon has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 109 by Jon, posted 12-05-2007 8:02 AM New Cat's Eye has replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 114 of 216 (438549)
12-05-2007 9:54 AM
Reply to: Message 109 by Jon
12-05-2007 8:02 AM


Re: Omni [actually] = all
Omni [actually] = all
Yup, and if all x are y then any x is y. If god is all-powerful, then he has any power, including the ability to make us know him.
Jon,
If god is omnipotent then he has the power to make someone know him. QED.
No?
Tell me, how would he go about doing that?
I dunno. How does Superman fly?
Magic?
I mean, he's omnipotent, he could do it in any way.
Now, that God is knowable doesn't mean that some people actually do know him. God very well might not be known, but you cannot say that he is unknowable if he is omnipotent.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 109 by Jon, posted 12-05-2007 8:02 AM Jon has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 116 by Phat, posted 12-05-2007 9:58 AM New Cat's Eye has replied
 Message 117 by Jon, posted 12-05-2007 10:01 AM New Cat's Eye has replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 120 of 216 (438567)
12-05-2007 10:55 AM
Reply to: Message 117 by Jon
12-05-2007 10:01 AM


Re: Omni [actually] = all
You have no support for your assertion, then, I take it?
Just logic.
Omnipotence is any power. Can he make us know him? Sure, he can do anything.
What's the problem?
Just because I can't explain how doesn't mean it is impossible.
Is this really all you got? I thought you were better than that.
And while we're supporting assertions, why don't you provide some support for this premise:
quote:
To empathise with God would require us to see the world the way God does.
Even without my crushing irrefutable argument , your argument falls apart because of this false premise.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 117 by Jon, posted 12-05-2007 10:01 AM Jon has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 122 by Jon, posted 12-05-2007 11:02 AM New Cat's Eye has replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 121 of 216 (438568)
12-05-2007 10:56 AM
Reply to: Message 116 by Phat
12-05-2007 9:58 AM


Re: Omni [actually] = all
Either god is knowable or not.
No matter what we "prove" or "disprove", we're not going to change what god actually is.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 116 by Phat, posted 12-05-2007 9:58 AM Phat has not replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 123 of 216 (438581)
12-05-2007 11:30 AM
Reply to: Message 122 by Jon
12-05-2007 11:02 AM


Re: Omni [actually] = all
What would he have to do to make us know him?
I already said that I don't know. And that me not knowing how does not mean that he cannot.
We should not assume God can make us know him unless there is some reason to back it.
The reason to back it is his omnipotence.
Claiming omnipotence and then scurrying off doesn't back your argument.
How have I scurried off? I'm right here. Or do you mean in the way you've avoided supporting your premise?
Basically, omnipotence is my argument. And really, there is no way to argue against it.
If he can do it, then show us how he would go about doing it. If not, then your argument is dead.
My argument is very much alive even whithout me being able to explain the "how would". Why does my inability to explain the method mean that the method is impossible?
Can you refute the arument? Explain to me how an omnipotent god would be unable to do something.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 122 by Jon, posted 12-05-2007 11:02 AM Jon has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 124 by jar, posted 12-05-2007 11:32 AM New Cat's Eye has replied
 Message 127 by bluescat48, posted 12-05-2007 11:54 AM New Cat's Eye has replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 125 of 216 (438586)
12-05-2007 11:44 AM
Reply to: Message 124 by jar
12-05-2007 11:32 AM


Re: Omni [actually] = all
Explain to me how an omnipotent god would be unable to do something.
Irrelevant. The question is "How would you be able to know it was God?"
Hrm, not in the OP. It seems your question is irrelevant.
But oh well.
quote:
How would you be able to know it was God?
The simple answer is that you can't.
But, if god is omnipotent, then she has the power to make you know that it is her. QED.
Exactly how you would know is beyond me.
How do you know that you're not in The Matrix?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 124 by jar, posted 12-05-2007 11:32 AM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 126 by jar, posted 12-05-2007 11:54 AM New Cat's Eye has replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 128 of 216 (438596)
12-05-2007 12:13 PM
Reply to: Message 126 by jar
12-05-2007 11:54 AM


Re: Omni [actually] = all
Yes, with an added qualifier.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 126 by jar, posted 12-05-2007 11:54 AM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 131 by jar, posted 12-05-2007 1:44 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 129 of 216 (438597)
12-05-2007 12:14 PM
Reply to: Message 127 by bluescat48
12-05-2007 11:54 AM


Re: Omni [actually] = all
Omnipotence is a belief not a fact.
Yes, and for the sake of argument, it is assumed to be fact as a premise.
If we're talking about something other than an omnipotent god, then we're not talking about what we are talking about.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 127 by bluescat48, posted 12-05-2007 11:54 AM bluescat48 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 130 by bluescat48, posted 12-05-2007 12:43 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 132 of 216 (438623)
12-05-2007 2:23 PM
Reply to: Message 130 by bluescat48
12-05-2007 12:43 PM


Re: Omni [actually] = all
Assumed by who? not jon or me.
Well, by me, at least.
If I'm talking about an omnipotent god then that god is assumed to be omnipotent. Jon had no objection to it. Its a pretty common assumption in discussions about god.
My argument relies on god's omnipotence. If we don't want to assume that god is omnipotent, then we don't need to address my argument.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 130 by bluescat48, posted 12-05-2007 12:43 PM bluescat48 has not replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 133 of 216 (438625)
12-05-2007 2:28 PM
Reply to: Message 131 by jar
12-05-2007 1:44 PM


Re: Omni [actually] = all
So are you saying that God could make us know but we could not know if it was God making us know?
No, that's a contradiction.
If god could make us know then we would know.
By default, we couldn't really know that we knew. But if god can do anything then he can make us really know that we know.
I don't really know how we would know, though.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 131 by jar, posted 12-05-2007 1:44 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 134 by jar, posted 12-05-2007 2:34 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 135 of 216 (438630)
12-05-2007 2:40 PM
Reply to: Message 134 by jar
12-05-2007 2:34 PM


Re: Omni [actually] = all
By default, we couldn't really know that we knew. But if god can do anything then he can make us really know that we know.
I don't really know how we would know, though.
Please parse your assertion.
No thanks.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 134 by jar, posted 12-05-2007 2:34 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 136 by Jon, posted 12-05-2007 3:56 PM New Cat's Eye has replied
 Message 145 by jar, posted 12-05-2007 6:05 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 137 of 216 (438643)
12-05-2007 4:00 PM
Reply to: Message 136 by Jon
12-05-2007 3:56 PM


meow
Cut the chase and get to the point.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 136 by Jon, posted 12-05-2007 3:56 PM Jon has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 139 by Jon, posted 12-05-2007 4:40 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 143 of 216 (438665)
12-05-2007 5:23 PM
Reply to: Message 139 by Jon
12-05-2007 4:40 PM


Re: meow
Answer the questions. If you don't, I have no idea where you're coming from.
I'm not comming from or going anywhere. My position is the same.
If god is omnipotent then he has the power to be knowable.
That is where I'm at. Would you care to repond to my argument?
If that is the case, I cannot get to the point in a way you will understand.
Try.
Please, answer the questions.
Ugh. This isn't fun.

I am like a cat. God is like a human. God wants to make me understand Them in all Their Godliness. What will God have to do to my ability to understand things before They can begin the information transfer?
I don't know.
Before you enter EvC Chat, is there any special programs you need rst?
Yes.
Why do you think my kitty had such troubles understanding what life was like for a human?
It lacks the mental cognizance and comprehension skills necessary for thought as complex as that.
Why would my kitty brush off the importance of the Hubble Telescope?
Because your kitty is unaware of the Hubble Telescope.
What would I have to do to get my cat to understand?
Make it smarter.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 139 by Jon, posted 12-05-2007 4:40 PM Jon has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 148 by Jon, posted 12-05-2007 10:25 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 146 of 216 (438677)
12-05-2007 6:28 PM
Reply to: Message 145 by jar
12-05-2007 6:05 PM


Re: Omni [actually] = all
That is kinda typical. I hear that response quite often from other Christians; when they are asked to actually look at their believes, they would rather not.
, jar.
There's nothing really to look at here. Its a simple definition of omnipotence. I have looked at my beliefs.
You, of course, are free to believe whatever you want

This message is a reply to:
 Message 145 by jar, posted 12-05-2007 6:05 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 147 by jar, posted 12-05-2007 6:40 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 153 of 216 (438790)
12-06-2007 10:04 AM
Reply to: Message 147 by jar
12-05-2007 6:40 PM


Re: Omni [actually] = all
If you say:
By default, we couldn't really know that we knew. But if god can do anything then he can make us really know that we know.
I don't really know how we would know, though.
then God might do something but we can not know that God did it?
No. We would really know that we knew.
So again, how can we know that it is God?
I don't know how, but if God is omnipotent, he certainly has the power to make us able to know.
If we are unable to know, then that god is not omnipotent.
ABE:
Actually, strike that last line, it's not really true.
Edited by Catholic Scientist, : see ABE:

This message is a reply to:
 Message 147 by jar, posted 12-05-2007 6:40 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 155 by jar, posted 12-06-2007 10:08 AM New Cat's Eye has replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024