Why TOE is not accepted

This is conceivably true within a short timeframe. A land mammal is not going to suddenly evolve into a fish over a few gernerations, for instance. Ther genetic code is just too different.What creationists don't seem to understand is that we are talking about millions of generations, not just a few. Ever played Telephone? Your message is usually pretty distorted at the end of the line from tiny differences along the way. Imagine a game of telephone millions of people long, that branches at every link (symbolizing multiple offspring). At the end of these chains, how different do you think the messages would be from the original? How different would they be from each other? This would be an imperfect analogy to evolution (there is no selection, so all species survive), but it does demonstrate the sheer amount of difference that can result from millions of imperfect copies.

That's like saying that the sky cannot possibly be blue, despite what we see, becuase an old book specifically states that it's pink. And someday you'll see that you were wrong all along.Why would God create the universe in such a way as to lie to us, Faith?But the real point is that you have zero evidence to back up such a claim. You have nothing except an old book you take as literal truth to show that the world is the way you think it is. Science has observable evidence. The Bible and science don't even have to come into conflict if you take a non-literallist interpretation of the Bible. Why should we disbelieve what our senses and reason tell us, in favor of an old book that you and a few others put total faith in?

It's irrational because she doesn't give any kind of reason to PROVE that it was impossible. She expects her opinion on the matter to carry the weight of fact.Saying "There is no conceivable way that the Earth holds me down with some invisible field called gravity which is a property of all mass," does not cause me to float away from the Earth. Another example of this would be, "1+1=2! That's the most ridiculous thing I have ever heard!"Just becuase she doesn't understand it or accept the evidence doesn't make it not true. Technically this is an Appeal to Ridicule fallacy.