Yaro, quit being a jerk.
Ooooo, nice. No evidence then?
You are the one refusing to deal with the evidence, and falsely claiming that only evolutionists exposed Haeckel's fraud.
I never said Only, I said scientists working in the field. It never boils down to one individual. As far as Baer is concerned, he promoted an alternate hypothesis to darwin, he was not a creationist by any means. Infact, Baers book is titled "The History of the Evolution of Animals".
http://www.serpentfd.org/b/vonbaer.html
Even if Baer flat out disagrees with darwin, he lived in the 1870's, long before genetics. Further, he disagreed on scientific ground based on THEN contemporary evidence. He was not promoting creation, but rather his own hypthesis of descent which in his view conflicted with darwins.
When are you going to back up your claims?
I'm not making any. Your the one whos saying scientists are still perpetuating the so called "myth".
your little disinformation demand question has no relevance since I clearly stated that parts of recapitulation and the use of Haeckel's drawings have now finally been abandoned.
Finally? try late 1800's early 1900's. Finally?
Whats your damn point then? It's been a 130 years!
That doesn't change the fact evolutionists for over 100 years made false claims concerning the data, claims they never substantiated as they claimed they had.
Over 100 years huh? Funny, since the theory was discredited in the late 1800's and abandoned early in the 1900's. Funny how you keep missing this.
This message has been edited by Yaro, 08-01-2005 02:11 PM
™ Version 4.2