Fossil Sorting in the Great Flood Part 2

OK I understand what your saying. Simple answer. The different layers have different kinds for the very reason that they are different.
A different layers means a different sediment flow/pressure. This would be, usually, because of the lay of the land. and so the different land with a different flow frooze the different communities.Perhaps off thread but ice dam collapse has been a gain for geology creationism. Most of us see these damsw as post flood event. They have overturned previous ideas that such things had not happened and also they have taught how water greatly affects the lands also not before understood. They are overthrowing everything in some sections of geology as we speak and of which we applaud.
Rob

Why evidence? You asked how something could be and I answered?
You guys are the ones who claim to be the only authority on these matters. RATHER
You show the evidence that led you to your conclusions. You just relate data and insist on one interpretation. We,like Sherlocke Holmes,say aha there is another interpretation. But regardless you don't show evidence only data/interpretation. (Imean not just you personally but the fields we talk about)I don't follow why ice dams are a problem for us. I'm sure it's the best news yet in geology. I think however we're off thread. Good new topic.
Rob

We're off thought. Evolution etc is in the dominent position. As A creationist I am attacking its credibility. Also along the way we bring up alternatives. Yet I do not claim to be engaged in Science.Yes knowledge of subject but not the scientific method. You'all do claim authority of science. I protest having to document my evidence. Your position is that you having evidence behind your claim,s and in no way could our ideas be true. This is what I deal with it. Only along the way do I offer answers to criticisms of our ideas.
I question your ideas and only answer how our ideas are not impossible. However i don't attempt to prove our ideas are right. This is a important difference of intent and I've always done in this way on these forums.
Rob

Nosyned you misunderstand the equation of what I said. I am dealing at a closer atomic explanation of intent.
Not grade thre math but high school math. Your not carrying the 2.The forum offers to the public discussion on these matters. I respond.
Evolutionists are the leaders and dominent voices. I respond.
You guys say evolution is true and unquestionable. I respond.
I hit at all assertions that catch my fancy.
Along the way I introduce creationist thought.
BUT
I don't attempt to prove my creationist thoughts. They are only a answer to when its required to have an alternative.
Like in a army I have a strict object and weapon. Yes I'm firing but the weapons I use are selective.
Rob