Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,902 Year: 4,159/9,624 Month: 1,030/974 Week: 357/286 Day: 0/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   I want one good reason that being gay is ok
bob_gray
Member (Idle past 5043 days)
Posts: 243
From: Virginia
Joined: 05-03-2004


Message 10 of 510 (121221)
07-02-2004 1:53 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by riVeRraT
07-02-2004 7:52 AM


One good reason (and this goes beyond being gay)
There is clearly no need to address points 1 - 4 since other people have done a fine job already. Here is my reason why being gay is OK, and this really applies to almost anything I do.
"The legitimate powers of government extend to such acts only as are injurious to others. But it does me no injury for my neighbor to say there are twenty gods or no god. It neither picks my pocket, nor breaks my leg."
Thomas Jefferson
This statement doesn't only apply to statements about god(s), it applies to almost all human activity. My personal moral code states that as long as what I do doesn't injure you in some way it is none of your business what I do. Hence almost everything I do is OK. This is why I think vice crimes are a waste of government money and resources. If you don't want to pay for sex then don't but what business is it of yours if I do? I personally don't care for alcohol but does that mean I should restrict your right to have it? If I want to have sex with people of the same gender then I think a better questions are "Why should you care?" and more importantly "Why should you be involved?"

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by riVeRraT, posted 07-02-2004 7:52 AM riVeRraT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 40 by RAZD, posted 07-03-2004 12:18 AM bob_gray has replied
 Message 48 by riVeRraT, posted 07-03-2004 12:24 AM bob_gray has not replied

bob_gray
Member (Idle past 5043 days)
Posts: 243
From: Virginia
Joined: 05-03-2004


Message 17 of 510 (121357)
07-02-2004 10:29 PM
Reply to: Message 13 by Buzsaw
07-02-2004 10:06 PM


I don't think that there is any data to support assertions 1 - 8. Just off the top of my head I can give you this counter argument: The Roman empire was tolerant of gays and it lasted 800 years, we would be lucky to do so well.
quote:
It's when they come out demanding stuff and displaying their perverted lifestyle to normal folks that becomes disgraceful and repulsive.
Do you mean demanding things like equal treatment under the law? How disgraceful and repulsive!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 13 by Buzsaw, posted 07-02-2004 10:06 PM Buzsaw has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 19 by Buzsaw, posted 07-02-2004 11:12 PM bob_gray has not replied

bob_gray
Member (Idle past 5043 days)
Posts: 243
From: Virginia
Joined: 05-03-2004


Message 37 of 510 (121405)
07-03-2004 12:12 AM
Reply to: Message 18 by Buzsaw
07-02-2004 11:08 PM


Gay clergymen, that is.
Do you have testimony from these clergymen or are you basing this on your false statement that gays molest more children?
.....Like same sex marriage with benefits and priviledges, contrary to the natural laws of governments and individuals for eons past? Like causing children to grow up with same sex parents, also un-naturally?
Maybe I'm just dense but I don't see how the fact that the government has been discriminating against gays for 200 years in any way means it should continue to do so. Children already grow up with same sex parents, they just aren't married.
On the contrary, fundamentalist Christians are generally honest, hard working, responsible good citizens who get along in society above the average.
I don't think you can back this up with any hard data. Christians are represented in the prison population in the same proportion as they are represented in the general population. As a side note: I wouldn't hire someone from Bob Jones University.
quote:
4. It is not natural to be gay. Whether one is evo or creo, the organs of the body were made for a male/female relationship.
It has to be natural, there is no other explanation for it.
This's nuts and you know it.
Not so nuts as you might think. Since it happens in nature it is clearly natural. You can't procreate with same gender sex but there is nothing unnatural about it. If it were unnatural you couldn't do it.
quote:
5. Gay is dangerous to health as is adultery sex with multiple couples.
Eating burgers is dangerous to health.
So you're agreeing, I assume. Both are dangerous to health.
I do agree with that. And I would also agree that neither is wrong.
quote:
7. Since the beginning of history, homosexuality has been considered an un-natural and dispicable lifestyle by the public in general.
Only on your planet. The great Greek philosophers all had young boys that bathed them and relieved them.
Nuts again to say all did this. Only the indecent and perverted ones would do such a terrible thing and we all know it.
Just because you don't want to believe that it was normal for them doesn't mean it wasn't.
All of these points aside it still doesn't change the fact that you have no more right to tell me what soap to use in the bathroom than who consents to share my bed. If you are worried about what your god might think just keep in mind that when you stand before him at your death he will _NOT_ ask you "What was Bob doing?"

This message is a reply to:
 Message 18 by Buzsaw, posted 07-02-2004 11:08 PM Buzsaw has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 46 by arachnophilia, posted 07-03-2004 12:23 AM bob_gray has not replied

bob_gray
Member (Idle past 5043 days)
Posts: 243
From: Virginia
Joined: 05-03-2004


Message 56 of 510 (121432)
07-03-2004 12:33 AM
Reply to: Message 40 by RAZD
07-03-2004 12:18 AM


Re: One good reason (and this goes beyond being gay)
quote:
thanks.
You are very welcome.
The argument is so simple it is hard to understand why people don't get it.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 40 by RAZD, posted 07-03-2004 12:18 AM RAZD has not replied

bob_gray
Member (Idle past 5043 days)
Posts: 243
From: Virginia
Joined: 05-03-2004


Message 70 of 510 (121448)
07-03-2004 12:45 AM
Reply to: Message 54 by riVeRraT
07-03-2004 12:32 AM


Re: One good reason (and this goes beyond being gay)
I want a clear cut answer, without comparing it to something else.
My answer was clear and I wasn't comparing it to something else. I was lumping many activities into one unified moral code. You could have asked about just about anything and I would have given you the same answer.
As far as suicide is concerned it shouldn't be illegal. In fact Oregon has passed legislation to make it legal and in spite of the justice departments best efforts it has withstood judicial scrutiny. Of course Dr. Kevorkian is still in jail but that is a different story.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 54 by riVeRraT, posted 07-03-2004 12:32 AM riVeRraT has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 88 by Rrhain, posted 07-03-2004 1:00 AM bob_gray has replied

bob_gray
Member (Idle past 5043 days)
Posts: 243
From: Virginia
Joined: 05-03-2004


Message 74 of 510 (121454)
07-03-2004 12:50 AM
Reply to: Message 58 by riVeRraT
07-03-2004 12:34 AM


If I smoke pot, it doesn't hurt anyone else, provided I grow it myself and not buy it through a drug ring, where people can die for drugs.
You are partially correct. Smoking pot doesn't hurt anyone (with the rare exception of the individual smoking). The _ONLY_ reason that engaging in the buying and selling of drugs is in any way dangerous is because it is illegal. It was dangerous to buy and sell alcohol in the 20's but now it isn't, why is that?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 58 by riVeRraT, posted 07-03-2004 12:34 AM riVeRraT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 81 by riVeRraT, posted 07-03-2004 12:51 AM bob_gray has not replied
 Message 84 by arachnophilia, posted 07-03-2004 12:56 AM bob_gray has not replied

bob_gray
Member (Idle past 5043 days)
Posts: 243
From: Virginia
Joined: 05-03-2004


Message 80 of 510 (121460)
07-03-2004 12:51 AM
Reply to: Message 63 by crashfrog
07-03-2004 12:38 AM


Marijuana is a self-correcting problem, anyway.
Self-correcting in what way?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 63 by crashfrog, posted 07-03-2004 12:38 AM crashfrog has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 85 by crashfrog, posted 07-03-2004 12:56 AM bob_gray has replied

bob_gray
Member (Idle past 5043 days)
Posts: 243
From: Virginia
Joined: 05-03-2004


Message 93 of 510 (121482)
07-03-2004 1:07 AM
Reply to: Message 85 by crashfrog
07-03-2004 12:56 AM


Off topic but a point of clarification
It's harmful to male fertility if overused.
Actually there is no evidence that this is true. It is just one of those rumors that gets perpetuated.
Morover, it's not a drug commonly associated with violent tendancies, now is it?
Indeed it isn't.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 85 by crashfrog, posted 07-03-2004 12:56 AM crashfrog has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 106 by crashfrog, posted 07-03-2004 1:32 AM bob_gray has not replied

bob_gray
Member (Idle past 5043 days)
Posts: 243
From: Virginia
Joined: 05-03-2004


Message 94 of 510 (121483)
07-03-2004 1:08 AM
Reply to: Message 88 by Rrhain
07-03-2004 1:00 AM


Re: One good reason (and this goes beyond being gay)
That is an important distinction. Thanks for pointing it out.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 88 by Rrhain, posted 07-03-2004 1:00 AM Rrhain has not replied

bob_gray
Member (Idle past 5043 days)
Posts: 243
From: Virginia
Joined: 05-03-2004


Message 105 of 510 (121502)
07-03-2004 1:30 AM
Reply to: Message 95 by riVeRraT
07-03-2004 1:11 AM


Re: Finally, I've been waiting for this to get approved.
You see someone said to me, its ok because it doesn't hurt anyone.
I said commiting suicide doesn't hurt anyone either. I was making the point that suicide must be ok because it doen't hurt anyone right?
Right. We have decided that it is OK since it isn't illegal. Since this one holds up then being gay holds up as well. Now you have your reason.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 95 by riVeRraT, posted 07-03-2004 1:11 AM riVeRraT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 108 by riVeRraT, posted 07-03-2004 1:37 AM bob_gray has replied

bob_gray
Member (Idle past 5043 days)
Posts: 243
From: Virginia
Joined: 05-03-2004


Message 152 of 510 (121618)
07-03-2004 1:28 PM
Reply to: Message 108 by riVeRraT
07-03-2004 1:37 AM


Re: Finally, I've been waiting for this to get approved.
I have searched and everything I can find indicates that while suicide is frowned upon it isn't illegal in the US. If you can cite something different I would be very interested to see it. Before this thread started I also thought suicide was illegal but I can't find any documentation to support that.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 108 by riVeRraT, posted 07-03-2004 1:37 AM riVeRraT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 171 by riVeRraT, posted 07-05-2004 9:25 AM bob_gray has not replied

bob_gray
Member (Idle past 5043 days)
Posts: 243
From: Virginia
Joined: 05-03-2004


Message 449 of 510 (124114)
07-12-2004 9:11 PM
Reply to: Message 419 by riVeRraT
07-12-2004 4:28 PM


quote:
kissing=sex, need more?
Does this mean you have watched your parents having sex, repeatedly?
And I'm with Dan on this one, I am a stud when it comes to sex. I must average 10 times a day, and some of that in public.
quote:
I am against it, need more?
Actually we were hoping you might explain why you are against it. It is difficult to have a discussion when you don't know what the other party's beef is with a perfectly simple situation. All of the people who are arguing with you simply don't feel it is wrong at all. Since it isn't wrong then it must be OK. You don't seem willing to explain why that isn't the case. And I'm just not buying the "mental anguish" angle. I see and read things every day that bother me to one degree or another but that doesn't make them wrong.
quote:
From post #354
Also, cumming in a girls mouth or spilling your seed anywhere but into the vagina is immoral. The rest is moral.
Did you hold this view before you became a Christian or after? If the answer is after then, as per you opening post, this isn’t a relevant reason.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 419 by riVeRraT, posted 07-12-2004 4:28 PM riVeRraT has not replied

bob_gray
Member (Idle past 5043 days)
Posts: 243
From: Virginia
Joined: 05-03-2004


Message 450 of 510 (124115)
07-12-2004 9:11 PM
Reply to: Message 422 by riVeRraT
07-12-2004 4:41 PM


quote:
Note, the serpent did not tell Eve to actually eat from the tree. He simply pointed out that god was lying to them regarding the consequences of eating from the tree.
Oh, you mean she got tricked. lol
No, She was told the truth. This is not trickery.
quote:
Without the tree, we would not have free will, we would just be robots.
This is off topic but I have wondered about this. Did Adam and Eve really have free will if they had no knowledge of good and evil?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 422 by riVeRraT, posted 07-12-2004 4:41 PM riVeRraT has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024