|
Author
|
Topic: Fossil Sorting in the Great Flood Part 2
|
AdminNosy
Administrator Posts: 4754 From: Vancouver, BC, Canada Joined: 11-11-2003
|
|
Message 2 of 411 (118687)
06-25-2004 3:19 PM
|
|
|
Thread moved here from the Proposed New Topics forum.
|
AdminNosy
Administrator Posts: 4754 From: Vancouver, BC, Canada Joined: 11-11-2003
|
|
|
Message 58 of 411 (119142)
06-27-2004 1:29 AM
|
Reply to: Message 50 by simple
06-27-2004 12:09 AM
|
|
Re: Ned's edict doubted
The post here was to use creation science sources to show there is doubt that there are no exceptions to the fossil record. We could go deeper, but many really seem to feel it is not a perfect sacrosanc order as Ned's edict procalaimed. And one of those links given to you was a creation science source showing that the pollen finds were wrong. Got anything else? We could go deeper? Ok, let's then. What do you have? Maybe you should also summarize what you've given so far in case we missed anything.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 50 by simple, posted 06-27-2004 12:09 AM | | simple has not replied |
|
AdminNosy
Administrator Posts: 4754 From: Vancouver, BC, Canada Joined: 11-11-2003
|
|
|
Message 59 of 411 (119144)
06-27-2004 1:32 AM
|
Reply to: Message 55 by edge
06-27-2004 1:17 AM
|
|
No do not clarify
Where "woman" came from is NOT part of the topic of this thread. There will be NO red herrings dragged across the path. nice try though, Ark
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 55 by edge, posted 06-27-2004 1:17 AM | | edge has not replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 61 by simple, posted 06-27-2004 1:39 AM | | AdminNosy has replied |
|
AdminNosy
Administrator Posts: 4754 From: Vancouver, BC, Canada Joined: 11-11-2003
|
|
|
Message 62 of 411 (119172)
06-27-2004 3:49 AM
|
Reply to: Message 61 by simple
06-27-2004 1:39 AM
|
|
red herrings
It is a common debating tactic to attempt to switch topics when you are in trouble with the current one. You seem to have an ongoing problem with sticking to the topic at hand. I'll continue to remind you and others if it starts to happen. If you sense a weakness, you may propose a new thread to discuss off topic items that arise here.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 61 by simple, posted 06-27-2004 1:39 AM | | simple has not replied |
|
AdminNosy
Administrator Posts: 4754 From: Vancouver, BC, Canada Joined: 11-11-2003
|
T O P I C !!
You are of course, absolutley right, LM. NosyNed, please watch the digressions from topic!
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 117 by Loudmouth, posted 07-01-2004 4:23 PM | | Loudmouth has not replied |
|
AdminNosy
Administrator Posts: 4754 From: Vancouver, BC, Canada Joined: 11-11-2003
|
|
|
Message 319 of 411 (127505)
07-25-2004 3:06 PM
|
Reply to: Message 318 by Percy
07-25-2004 1:09 PM
|
|
T O P I C !!
Bill is right Percy, Back to fossil sorting. What is and isn't science can be taken to the appropriate thread.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 318 by Percy, posted 07-25-2004 1:09 PM | | Percy has not replied |
|
AdminNosy
Administrator Posts: 4754 From: Vancouver, BC, Canada Joined: 11-11-2003
|
Topic!
Sorry Robert but you've been lead a bit astray by previous posters. The nature of the geology is not on topic here in my opinion. Would someone please propose a new topic for this; pick up the picture and Roberts explanation and then we can carry on. Thank you. Now back to sorting.
|
AdminNosy
Administrator Posts: 4754 From: Vancouver, BC, Canada Joined: 11-11-2003
|
There is a topic for this.
Please take your comments on this to
Applying Science to Past Events
|
AdminNosy
Administrator Posts: 4754 From: Vancouver, BC, Canada Joined: 11-11-2003
|
Topics
Take this to the apropriate thread! Mark, Robert! The next person who carries on this off-topic path will be resting for a day. Thank you.
|
AdminNosy
Administrator Posts: 4754 From: Vancouver, BC, Canada Joined: 11-11-2003
|
Topic
It was a historical theory and was not testable. That is the topic of another thread. In that thread:
Applying Science to Past Eventsyou make a number of similar assertions, ignore almost all that is posted in response and then still bring it up here. You may continue the discussions in the other thread you may not continue it here. I might get a reputation as a hanging judge.
|
AdminNosy
Administrator Posts: 4754 From: Vancouver, BC, Canada Joined: 11-11-2003
|
|
|
Message 410 of 411 (165234)
12-04-2004 6:55 PM
|
Reply to: Message 15 by Loudmouth
06-25-2004 7:10 PM
|
|
Bump for The Literalist
Here is one problem for your flood hypothosis. There seems to be no reasonable explanation for the fossil order.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 15 by Loudmouth, posted 06-25-2004 7:10 PM | | Loudmouth has not replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 411 by AdminJar, posted 12-05-2004 1:05 AM | | AdminNosy has not replied |
|
™ Version 4.2