Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,929 Year: 4,186/9,624 Month: 1,057/974 Week: 16/368 Day: 16/11 Hour: 0/4


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Are flightless birds a reversion?
Rob 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5880 days)
Posts: 2297
Joined: 06-01-2006


Message 23 of 44 (419270)
09-01-2007 9:43 PM
Reply to: Message 15 by molbiogirl
09-01-2007 8:21 PM


Re: Ostrige... Ostrage...
molbiogirl:
Is this your version of "Coelacanths are unchanging forms that show no evidence of evolution" aka "living fossils refute evolution"?
I don't know if living fossils refute evolution or not. They may well show some devolution; but, they certainly do not show evolution at the level of chemical origins.
Edited by Rob, : No reason given.
Edited by Rob, : No reason given.
Edited by Rob, : No reason given.
Edited by Rob, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 15 by molbiogirl, posted 09-01-2007 8:21 PM molbiogirl has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 24 by jar, posted 09-01-2007 10:02 PM Rob has replied

  
Rob 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5880 days)
Posts: 2297
Joined: 06-01-2006


Message 25 of 44 (419282)
09-01-2007 10:20 PM
Reply to: Message 24 by jar
09-01-2007 10:02 PM


Re: More off topic nonsense from Rob.
jar:
Come on Rob. Will you EVER post something relevant or on topic?
This thread, in case you missed it, is "Are flightless birds a reversion?"
I believe I said that I do not know... and then added; they may show reversion. I only used different words. That was my two cents on the matter... and then I politely pointed to the related topic. It's not like I addressed it here.
Will you ever stop asking logically fallacious questions like, 'Have you stopped beating your wife yet'?
Let me try your technique though. It seems to be tolerated by the admins...
Jar, have you always had control issues?
Edited by Rob, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 24 by jar, posted 09-01-2007 10:02 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 26 by jar, posted 09-01-2007 10:26 PM Rob has not replied

  
Rob 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5880 days)
Posts: 2297
Joined: 06-01-2006


Message 28 of 44 (419287)
09-01-2007 10:39 PM
Reply to: Message 27 by molbiogirl
09-01-2007 10:32 PM


Re: More off topic nonsense from Rob.
EVC rule: Bare links with no supporting discussion should be avoided. Make the argument in your own words and use links as supporting references.
molbiogirl:
It's not just you, jar.
Rob is posting bare links to his PNT in other threads, too.
Sometimes they cannot be avoided, but I have deleted all links just to accomodate you and yours...
Edited by Rob, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 27 by molbiogirl, posted 09-01-2007 10:32 PM molbiogirl has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024