ICANT writes:
quote:
So why can't it be refered to as what it is? The Theory of Biological Evolution.
End of problem.
Because there is no problem. When we're talking biology, everybody understands that the term "evolution" refers to biological evolution, not stellar evolution.
Note, both chemistry and biology use the term "nucleus." But somehow, nobody ever confuses the "nucleus" of the atom with the "nucleus" of the cell. When we talk about a "nuclear" weapon, we don't worry about teratogenic weapons. We all know we're talking about the atomic nucleus, not the cellular nucleus.
Your complaint that there is some confusion about the term "evolution" is nothing more than a semantic game.
Rrhain
Thank you for your submission to
Science. Your paper was reviewed by a jury of seventh graders so that they could look for balance and to allow them to make up their own minds. We are sorry to say that they found your paper "bogus," specifically describing the section on the laboratory work "boring." We regret that we will be unable to publish your work at this time.