The confusing part of my statement to you is that I was hinting at a little deception on the part of Evolutionist. If they can put everything under the umbrella of The Theory of Evolution and mean The Theory of Biological Evolution they can claim evolution to be proven. Even though they are only refering to Biological Evolution the man in the street doesn't know that. So he believes Evolutionist are saying all things that evolve are proved, which to most would include abiogenesis as life coming from non life.
It appears that you believe that "Evolutionists" are being intentionally misleading and purposefully conflating different meanings of evolution when they talk about the Theory of Evolution. Do you have any evidence to support this contention, or is it something you made up in your head?
Those who would sacrifice an essential liberty for a temporary security will lose both, and deserve neither. -- Benjamin Franklin
We see monsters where science shows us windmills. -- Phat
™ Version 4.2
