Hi ICANT,
I'm going to take a brief moment to explain the painfully obvious to you. If you don't get it then I don't think you're ever going to get it.
ICANT writes:
It is preached on this site there is only one type of evolution.
No it isn't. You can even go to the [forum=-2] forum and find discussions of stellar evolution. Just type "stellar evolution" (including the quotes) into the search box for that forum.
Evolution, like most words in the English language, has more than one definition. Subbie explained precisely which one he meant when he asked how creationists define evolution. If you want to ask how people define other meanings of evolution then propose a thread.
I will be presenting evidence to affirm that everything from singularity to present day is evolution and is taught as such.
Did you take physics in high school, or did they at least teach physics at your high school? If so, did they call it physics or evolution?
In college I took an astronomy course, which included cosmology and the Big Bang. They called the course astronomy, not evolution, and they called the cosmology section cosmology, not evolution.
If you joined a discussion board about the sport of running, would you insist that running had to include running for political office, running a company, and machinery that is in operation? Of course not. So why are you insisting that threads about biological evolution have to include other definitions of evolution?
I'll promote this thread if you really want because I'm sure some useful clarifications and explanations will be contributed, but this is all really very simple and shouldn't need to be explained.
| -- | Percy |
| | EvC Forum Director |
™ Version 4.2
