Evolution.

All lies, and well-known and long-refuted ones as well. Where are you getting this so-called "information"? Jack Chick comiocs? Why are you swallowing these falsehoods whole? How gullible are you?One of the several Neandertals skeletons found had arthritis, but the others did not.Peking man: the original finds have disppeared, but we still have the casts made from them, and additional fossils that have been discovered at the site, and fossils from the same era discovered at other sites.Pretty much nobody ever was influenced by Nebraska Man. Heidelberg man's jaw is definitely not that of a modern human.Your confused version of the Lucy's knee joint canard is totally off the wall. Here's the real scoop on Lucy.

See Lucy's Knee Joint: A Case Study in Creationists' Willingness to Admit their Errors.

Then you have a severe problem with reading comprehension. From the linked page:

quote:

---

Creationists have been making the claim that Donald Johanson found the knee joint of "Lucy," a 40%-complete skeleton of the species Australopithecus afarensis, in a location "Sixty to seventy meters lower in the strata and two to three kilometers away" (Willis 1987). They have sometimes gone on to add the claim that "Only under questioning did [Johanson] admit that the knee was found over a mile from Lucy. To the best of our knowledge this admission has not appeared in print!" (Willis 1987; emphasis in original; Also see Brown 1989a, p. 44) The claim is used by creationists to show that (a) evolutionists are dishonest and (b) "Lucy" did not walk upright. It successfully shows neither of these things, because it is false. ... The claim is not only false, it is clearly shown to be false in Johanson's published writings about "Lucy" (e.g., Johanson and Edey 1981, ch. 7-8) and it has been pointed out repeatedly to its proponents that it is false.{emphasis added - JRF}

---

Totally false, as demonstrated at the link I posted already.