randman,
If random is based on our mere lack of knowledge, then it is not inherently random, but random more describes our perspective than an absolute quality.
Why do beneficial mutations happen in tiny fractions in bacteria that exist under exactly the same conditions if the mutation is non-random, then? If it were non-random we would see all or most of the bacteria get the same mutation, but we don't.
Are you sure? I would think that we could under certain conditions predict with a high degree of accuracy the mutations that will occur in certain situations, and with more knowledge, we should be able to predict with even more accuracy.
But let's say we have complete knowledge of how genes work, the exact conditions, etc,...are you saying even then we could not predict the mutations would occur under certain sequences under certain conditions?
Ad hoc
Mark
This message has been edited by mark24, 02-15-2006 04:01 AM
There are 10 kinds of people in this world; those that understand binary, & those that don't