Agreed Phospho. There is tremendous variety in all species and the so-called proofs of evolutionists are what I believe to be mere variations, or minor changes within the same species. Billions of living organisms and fossils have given us absolutely no evidence whatsoever to show the slightest tendency to evolve out of the original kind to which each belongs. Development and normal growth within a species is Not evolution. Improvement or even new varieties within a species is Not evolution either. Science has demonstrated the law of improvement of a species through breeding and cultivation, however the same law has never been able to produce a New species. The TOE must prove Transmutation- that being a change in nature, substance, form, and alteration of essence by a slow and gradual process of mutation from one species to another, and from the lower to the higher. TOE just cannot find a way to do this, or find existing proof that it has happened, and without a change OF species there can be no evolution. Science has shown us that life will interbreed in closly related variations, but it has also shown us that there is an impassable gulf when interbreeding is attempted between different kinds of species. We all know that there can be no evolution without the power of reproduction in living things. Since reproduction is a prior condition to evolution, it Cannot be a product of it. This fact and the logical neccessity for the power of continued reproduction is a significant stumbling block to TOE. The power of reproduction is Not in the embryo, but only in the mature parent. Can an egg produce an egg? No. Can an egg improve upon itself? No. Improvement can only come in and through the mature form. Therefore, if life needs the mature form first, where does that leave us?? Quite a dilema for TOE indeed.
TRUE Science rejects many aspects of TOE and since not one of the many branches of TOE has been proven, let alone the main theory, I believe it to be purely speculative and at this point in time, quite literally a bankrupt philosophy - most definately not a scientific fact.
Until next time :-)
Paul