Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,904 Year: 4,161/9,624 Month: 1,032/974 Week: 359/286 Day: 2/13 Hour: 1/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Is Abiogenesis a fact?
Discreet Label
Member (Idle past 5093 days)
Posts: 272
Joined: 11-17-2005


Message 5 of 303 (273736)
12-29-2005 2:05 AM
Reply to: Message 4 by SuperNintendo Chalmers
12-28-2005 7:32 PM


Re: Theory of Abiogenesis vs. Hypothesis of Abiogenesis
As to the question of there being enough information to deduce whether there was no life on earth originally...I thought there was.
And the way the evidence was indicated was through geology, i believe. Right now my information is a little sketchy its been a couple million words reading since i last read about life on earth earlier.
talk origins had a few faqs in regards to it, one of them indicated that oxygen dependant life had not occured yet because earth was a heavily reducing atmosphere. and when photosynthesis started occuring is when we started moving toward a more oxidizing atmoshphere. And the evidence that photosynthesis wasn't present the entire time was because of thick bands of oxidized iron compounds IIRC. Any oxygen that was created through photosynthesis pretty quickly bound up with iron which started forming thick layers on the crust.
Err...so the heavy bands of iron kind of indicate that start of oxygen type life (i'm not so sure about the not so oxygen kind of life that exists near thermal vents though)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 4 by SuperNintendo Chalmers, posted 12-28-2005 7:32 PM SuperNintendo Chalmers has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 6 by Nuggin, posted 12-29-2005 2:34 AM Discreet Label has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024