Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,907 Year: 4,164/9,624 Month: 1,035/974 Week: 362/286 Day: 5/13 Hour: 2/0


EvC Forum ⇒ Social and Religious Issues ⇒ Faith and Belief ⇒

The definition of GOD

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The definition of GOD
ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.6

Normal Thread Display
Message 52 of 312 (453977)
02-05-2008 12:40 AM 		Reply to: Message 51 by rulerofthisuniverse
02-04-2008 11:55 PM

Re-Definition
Hi rulerofthisuniverse,
​
rulerofthisuniverse writes:
​
1. Come up with your own definition of GOD
​
I AM
This message is a reply to:
 Message 51 by rulerofthisuniverse, posted 02-04-2008 11:55 PM rulerofthisuniverse has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 73 by rulerofthisuniverse, posted 02-05-2008 1:29 PM ICANT has replied
ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.6

Normal Thread Display
Message 74 of 312 (454076)
02-05-2008 1:47 PM 		Reply to: Message 73 by rulerofthisuniverse
02-05-2008 1:29 PM

Re: Re-Definition
Hi rulerofthisuniverse,
​
rulerofthisuniverse writes:
​
You really have to explain what qualifies I AM as GOD.
​
I thought the term was self explanatory.
​
As I understand it it is all inclussive.
​
Which would be everyting that ever was, is, or ever will be.
​
You have fun now,
This message is a reply to:
 Message 73 by rulerofthisuniverse, posted 02-05-2008 1:29 PM rulerofthisuniverse has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 94 by rulerofthisuniverse, posted 02-05-2008 4:46 PM ICANT has replied
ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.6

Normal Thread Display
Message 109 of 312 (454172)
02-05-2008 7:31 PM 		Reply to: Message 94 by rulerofthisuniverse
02-05-2008 4:46 PM

Re: Re-Definition
Hi rulerofthisuniverse,
​
rulerofthisuniverse writes:
​
What I would also ask is would this I AM have the same qualities as my definition? if yes why, and if no why?
​
ICANT writes:
​
Which would be everyting that ever was, is, or ever will be.
​
What part of everything is it that you do not understand?
​
Why question.. You might have left out something I did not.
​
Have fun,
​
"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."
This message is a reply to:
 Message 94 by rulerofthisuniverse, posted 02-05-2008 4:46 PM rulerofthisuniverse has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 120 by rulerofthisuniverse, posted 02-06-2008 11:19 PM ICANT has replied
ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.6

Normal Thread Display
Message 133 of 312 (454503)
02-07-2008 11:28 AM 		Reply to: Message 120 by rulerofthisuniverse
02-06-2008 11:19 PM

Re: Re-Definition
Hi rulerofthisuniverse,
​
rulerofthisuniverse writes:
​
Well if God was everything that ever was and everything that ever will be, this would mean that GOD would be all things to all people,
​
Why are you making this God a thing?
​
therefore your definition of God is still inadequate.
​
I think my God is just as adequate as your god.
​
Sorry you don't like my definition of God.
​
You must declare this if not your god is not the ultimate god
​
Have fun,.
​
"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."
This message is a reply to:
 Message 120 by rulerofthisuniverse, posted 02-06-2008 11:19 PM rulerofthisuniverse has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 141 by rulerofthisuniverse, posted 02-08-2008 7:52 PM ICANT has replied
ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.6

Normal Thread Display
Message 153 of 312 (454946)
02-09-2008 1:24 PM 		Reply to: Message 141 by rulerofthisuniverse
02-08-2008 7:52 PM

Re-Definition
Hi rulerofthisuniverse,
​
rulerofthisuniverse writes:
​
Well it's not that I don't like your definition, I falsified it thats all.
​
I would like to give my full definition of my God but that would go against what you say here under #1:
​
Message 51
rulerofthisuniverse writes:
​
1. Come up with your own definition of GOD that does not include any theological ideas, or a better definition than mine.
2. Show how any of the qualities above do not apply to my definition
3. Show that GOD would not be the ultimate possible being/thing
​
My God just happens to be a God that is associated with Christianity.
​
God Bless,
​
"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."
This message is a reply to:
 Message 141 by rulerofthisuniverse, posted 02-08-2008 7:52 PM rulerofthisuniverse has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 159 by rulerofthisuniverse, posted 02-09-2008 9:56 PM ICANT has not replied
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024