Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,929 Year: 4,186/9,624 Month: 1,057/974 Week: 16/368 Day: 16/11 Hour: 0/4


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Does God Really Exist???
Dan Carroll
Inactive Member


Message 151 of 305 (87690)
02-20-2004 9:32 AM
Reply to: Message 150 by nator
02-20-2004 9:15 AM


Heh heh. I love that show. Unfortunately, there's not a lot of quotable stuff, because it's all in the delivery.
One of my absolute favorites:
Xander: But... It's just that it's buggin' me, this "cool" thing. I mean, what is it? How do you get it? Who doesn't have it? And who decides who doesn't have it? What is the essence of cool?
Oz: Not sure.
Xander: I mean, you yourself, Oz, are considered more or less cool. Why is that?
Oz: Am I?
Xander: Is it about the talking? You know, the way you tend to express yourself in short, noncommittal phrases?
Oz: Could be.
Bah, still at least three months until season 6 is out on DVD...
[This message has been edited by Dan Carroll, 02-20-2004]

"Perhaps you should take your furs and your literal interpretations to the other side of the river."
-Anya

This message is a reply to:
 Message 150 by nator, posted 02-20-2004 9:15 AM nator has not replied

nator
Member (Idle past 2201 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 152 of 305 (87691)
02-20-2004 9:42 AM
Reply to: Message 70 by Chris
02-18-2004 12:53 PM


quote:
(Mat 7:1-5): Judge not, that ye be not judged. For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged: and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again.... etc.
You , to clarify, do you believe that one may judge others just so long as one doesn't mind being judged oneself?
...because that's what the passage means.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 70 by Chris, posted 02-18-2004 12:53 PM Chris has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 153 by Chris, posted 02-20-2004 11:04 AM nator has replied

Chris
Inactive Member


Message 153 of 305 (87707)
02-20-2004 11:04 AM
Reply to: Message 152 by nator
02-20-2004 9:42 AM


Well, yes.. basically. But can't just take it like that.
If you look Bible, you have to look it as a whole.
And then after that verse..
" "Why do you look at the speck of sawdust in your brother's eye and pay no attention to the plank in your own eye? 4How can you say to your brother, 'Let me take the speck out of your eye,' when all the time there is a plank in your own eye? 5You hypocrite, first take the plank out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother's eye. "
You have to remove the plank, when you have removed the plank.. you would realize that you could do anyting. So you would leave them to the authorities and not judge them yourself. And also it says brother. (The one with removing speck)
(My oppinion)
Ofcourse I could be wrong.. what are you suggesting, schrafinator?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 152 by nator, posted 02-20-2004 9:42 AM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 160 by nator, posted 02-20-2004 3:53 PM Chris has replied

CreationMan
Inactive Member


Message 154 of 305 (87747)
02-20-2004 2:33 PM
Reply to: Message 130 by :æ:
02-19-2004 3:13 PM


Re: Baboons
Actually, I believe that you and I (at a minimum) were also discussing the existence of God...
Yes I believe we were. I was confusing you with being the same as another member. It seems there are two different members.
right up until I demolished your attempt at advancing the Kalaam Cosmological argument. Did you plan on acknowledging that at all, or were you just gonna keep on like you are and not address it?
I don't remember you saying anything abou it. I may have not even seen your post.
[This message has been edited by CreationMan, 02-20-2004]

"The Fool has said in his heart, 'There is no God'"
Creation Man

This message is a reply to:
 Message 130 by :æ:, posted 02-19-2004 3:13 PM :æ: has not replied

CreationMan
Inactive Member


Message 155 of 305 (87753)
02-20-2004 2:58 PM
Reply to: Message 129 by AdminBrian
02-19-2004 3:11 PM


Re: Baboons
If there is he's doing a horrible, dispicable, and disasterous job.
You would be advised to stop being so sexist with your comments, one of the admins is a young lady.
That is not a sexist comment. The term "he" or "he's" is a general term that refers to person, not to gender. I refuse to be politically correct.
As for a horrible, dispicable (sic) and disasterous (sic) job, it sort of reflects your debating skills.
Oh and you may also want to invest in a dictionary or a spell checker, if you are going to have a go at someone then making two spelling mistakes in the space of three words is not very impressive.
Clearly no one shares in my hUmor. I'll refrain from the spelling mistakes.
So far you have violated Rules 4 and 6.
The vast majority of what you have posted is nothing more than bare assertions, which is contrary to forum rule number 4 Bare assertions on controversial points should be avoided by providing supporting evidence or argument. Once challenged, support for any assertion should be provided.
Intersting assertion, but you failed to provide an example.
You have also violated rule 6 Never include material not your own without attribution to the original source.
I was in no way trying to claim credit for that material. As a stated in a later post I posted that to reply to Dan Caroll who I did not have time to reply to because I was late for work.
As for the reference, one of your young lady admins posted the sources for me.
Could you please address the following assertions that forum members have asked you to provide proof for? Thank you.
Message 12 : Yes Alexander Fleming did invent penicillin, but who invented Alexander Fleming??? Who gave him the knowledge, who allowed him to be born, who gave him the breathe of life?
Those are questions...how do you provide proof for questions?
Message 17: It's called cause and effect. And it starts from God. Ultimately God is the cause and we are the effect.
Cause and effect is a Sci law. The rest is me explaining my position and what I believe.
Message 22: Ok, I would be glad to. Just as it is impossible for buildings to be built by an explosion in a brick factory, likewise it's biologically impossible for life to have originated by an explosion (big bang) 15 - 20 billion years ago.
Could you please provide evidence for both of the claims you make?
Sure...Drive to a local brick factory and drop a bomb on it and let me know what happens. Explosions in Chemistry generate heat and ultimately contribute to the degredation of the organisms. No scientific test has ever shown an explosion to produce ANY form of life. (Miller experiments didn't produce life) So the burden of proof is on YOU not me.
Message 43: and I'll bring the evidence for God with me.
You haven’t supported this either.
Unfortunately my job puts demands on my time and I am unable to reply to EVERY point made by EVERY member. I posted a supstantially large email in reply to Dan Carroll (sp?). I know in some member's opinions I have not succeed, but niether am I finished with this thread.

"The Fool has said in his heart, 'There is no God'"
Creation Man

This message is a reply to:
 Message 129 by AdminBrian, posted 02-19-2004 3:11 PM AdminBrian has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 156 by crashfrog, posted 02-20-2004 3:03 PM CreationMan has replied
 Message 157 by :æ:, posted 02-20-2004 3:12 PM CreationMan has not replied

crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1498 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 156 of 305 (87755)
02-20-2004 3:03 PM
Reply to: Message 155 by CreationMan
02-20-2004 2:58 PM


No scientific test has ever shown an explosion to produce ANY form of life.
The Big Bang isn't an explosion, by the way. So your position about explosions is kind of a strawman, isn't it?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 155 by CreationMan, posted 02-20-2004 2:58 PM CreationMan has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 158 by CreationMan, posted 02-20-2004 3:28 PM crashfrog has not replied

:æ: 
Suspended Member (Idle past 7215 days)
Posts: 423
Joined: 07-23-2003


Message 157 of 305 (87756)
02-20-2004 3:12 PM
Reply to: Message 155 by CreationMan
02-20-2004 2:58 PM


Re: Baboons
CreationMan writes:
I don't remember you saying anything abou it. I may have not even seen your post.
It was in Post 98 and in the future I suggest simply looking for the avatar -- it kinda sticks out.
Cause and effect is a Sci law.
No, it's not. Cause and effect are macroscopic approximations of the aggregate effect of millions of probablistic quantum events.
The rest is me explaining my position and what I believe.
No, the rest was a bare assertion. You stated it as though it were fact. If you do not have the support to establish as a fact, it is disingenuous and against forum rules to state it as such.
Sure...Drive to a local brick factory and drop a bomb on it and let me know what happens. Explosions in Chemistry generate heat and ultimately contribute to the degredation of the organisms. No scientific test has ever shown an explosion to produce ANY form of life.
This is not evidence that what you've described is impossible -- only that it is improbable. What would prevent it from ever happening as you've asserted?
So the burden of proof is on YOU not me.
This is so disingenuous it makes me angry. You can't simply come in here throwing around bald assertions without a modicum of support and then insist that YOU don't have any burden to prove them.
Unfortunately my job puts demands on my time and I am unable to reply to EVERY point made by EVERY member.
Then I suggest you cease with the horse hockey splatter gun approach and focus on one or two specific issues at a time.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 155 by CreationMan, posted 02-20-2004 2:58 PM CreationMan has not replied

CreationMan
Inactive Member


Message 158 of 305 (87764)
02-20-2004 3:28 PM
Reply to: Message 156 by crashfrog
02-20-2004 3:03 PM


There are actually several different takes on the big bang. Everything from explosion to expansion and Enstien's relativity.
Nobody knows. There is one theory, called "inflation" that suggests it was caused by a quantum mechanical "fluctuation" in an
older background universe that raised the energy of a very tiny
portion in such a way that that portion just grew and grew and
grew in size (inflationary expansion). There are other theories
that are associated with black-hole formation in pre-existing
universes. And of course there's the anthropic principle: if
we weren't here, then in all probability the universe would look
very different.~asmith
So which one are we debating?

"The Fool has said in his heart, 'There is no God'"
Creation Man

This message is a reply to:
 Message 156 by crashfrog, posted 02-20-2004 3:03 PM crashfrog has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 159 by Dan Carroll, posted 02-20-2004 3:36 PM CreationMan has not replied

Dan Carroll
Inactive Member


Message 159 of 305 (87765)
02-20-2004 3:36 PM
Reply to: Message 158 by CreationMan
02-20-2004 3:28 PM


quote:
So which one are we debating?
I thought we were debating whether or not there was a God. You seem to have been arguing for the existence of God on the premise that it's impossible for the universe to exist without him.
The presence of several different theories as to how the universe would be possible without God would seem to make your task harder.

"Perhaps you should take your furs and your literal interpretations to the other side of the river."
-Anya

This message is a reply to:
 Message 158 by CreationMan, posted 02-20-2004 3:28 PM CreationMan has not replied

nator
Member (Idle past 2201 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 160 of 305 (87770)
02-20-2004 3:53 PM
Reply to: Message 153 by Chris
02-20-2004 11:04 AM


I just wanted to make sure you weren't implying that the passage you quoted said that it was wrong to judge. It just means that if one chooses to judge others, one should expect to be subjected to judgement as well.
I also agree that The Bible needs to be taken as a whole. That's why isolated Bible quotes are not very useful.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 153 by Chris, posted 02-20-2004 11:04 AM Chris has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 161 by Chris, posted 02-20-2004 4:26 PM nator has not replied
 Message 163 by DoingMyBest, posted 02-21-2004 10:34 PM nator has replied

Chris
Inactive Member


Message 161 of 305 (87778)
02-20-2004 4:26 PM
Reply to: Message 160 by nator
02-20-2004 3:53 PM


That's why isolated Bible quotes are not very useful.
---
But I wrote this:
(Mat 7:1-5): Judge not, that ye be not judged. For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged: and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again.... etc.
I wrote it with "...." and with "etc", but I quess you are right. I could miss-lead people with that, sorry..my bad.
And thanks for telling me.
Best wishes.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 160 by nator, posted 02-20-2004 3:53 PM nator has not replied

Adminnemooseus
Administrator
Posts: 3976
Joined: 09-26-2002


Message 162 of 305 (87781)
02-20-2004 4:36 PM


Topic running pretty fast and furious
Considering giving it a temporary closing, to let thing cool off, and to let people consider was has been said so far.
BUT, will leave open for now.
People, be calm,
Adminnemooseus

Comments on moderation procedures? - Go to
Change in Moderation?
or
too fast closure of threads

DoingMyBest
Inactive Member


Message 163 of 305 (87930)
02-21-2004 10:34 PM
Reply to: Message 160 by nator
02-20-2004 3:53 PM


If and if...
When I was young I had an experience which proved beyond any doubt that "God" is indeed a very real person. If the big bang theory is correct then God must have evolved. I can theorize with the best and rest of us but where is the evidence that there exists another planet with pre-sapien spirit hominids. God is a spirit. Were his ancestors spirits. Or did flesh evolve into spirit? If any of you saw what I've seen there would be no question at all "Does God exist?". There really are people in the universe who look just like us and live for thousands of years at the least, without any doubt. I have a question as well... How do the stars keep lit with flame if there is no oxygen in space? I am aware it is possible to start with 1 thing which produces enough of it's own fuel to make 2 of itself without extinguishing the first. This would mean though that there are stars which will burn forever. I am sure there are particles which aren't made of smaller particles. These stable particles don't break down at all even literally forever. It is wise to hypothesize yourself as one of these, anything less is a bit futile. I am sure there is a particle which is stable and doesn't break down and this is the basis for all other particles. If something were to travel faster than light would it be by nature invisible...if even for a while? If...if...hmmm.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 160 by nator, posted 02-20-2004 3:53 PM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 164 by crashfrog, posted 02-22-2004 1:22 AM DoingMyBest has not replied
 Message 165 by nator, posted 02-22-2004 10:41 AM DoingMyBest has not replied

crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1498 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 164 of 305 (87940)
02-22-2004 1:22 AM
Reply to: Message 163 by DoingMyBest
02-21-2004 10:34 PM


This is off-topic but:
How do the stars keep lit with flame if there is no oxygen in space?
Stars don't combust. They produce energy through the fusion of hydrogen nuclei into helium. This is a process that generates intense energy and requires no oxygen, because it's a nuclear reaction, not a chemical one.
If you have more questions about stars you should take them to the astronomy topics.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 163 by DoingMyBest, posted 02-21-2004 10:34 PM DoingMyBest has not replied

nator
Member (Idle past 2201 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 165 of 305 (87962)
02-22-2004 10:41 AM
Reply to: Message 163 by DoingMyBest
02-21-2004 10:34 PM


Re: If and if...
quote:
When I was young I had an experience which proved beyond any doubt that "God" is indeed a very real person.
A person? Really?
Where does He live?
quote:
If the big bang theory is correct then God must have evolved.
Really? Why?
quote:
I can theorize with the best and rest of us but where is the evidence that there exists another planet with pre-sapien spirit hominids.
Um, what, exactly, are pre-sapien spirit hominids?
quote:
God is a spirit.
I thought you said that God was a person.
quote:
Were his ancestors spirits. Or did flesh evolve into spirit?
Is there any way of knowing anything about the facts surrounding these questions? I don't think so.
quote:
If any of you saw what I've seen there would be no question at all "Does God exist?".
That's what everybody who believes says. The problem being, of course, that every person's experience of God is purely individual. I can't also look at what you saw to judge for myself about the existence of your God, so all we are left with is individual personal testimony. Fine for you, but utterly unconvincing for me.
quote:
There really are people in the universe who look just like us and live for thousands of years at the least, without any doubt.
Without any doubt? Any at all? Can you show us one of these thousands of years old people?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 163 by DoingMyBest, posted 02-21-2004 10:34 PM DoingMyBest has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 166 by Phat, posted 02-22-2004 11:37 AM nator has not replied
 Message 167 by mike the wiz, posted 02-22-2004 11:42 AM nator has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024