Syamsu writes:
Quite meaningless references to logical fallacies, I'm not impressed.
The special thing of realization is the special thing of choice, it may turn out differently. Heaven or hell, as God decides.
Well I can foresee that in the end all realizations will be described by science as between 1 and 0, and constructs of between 1 and 0. But until science get's at that point, all scientists will shudder in fear for accepting what in essence much equates to decison, which currently has more associative meaning with heaven or hell, as it has with 1 or zero.
I guess the problem here is that you can argue what sort of world we live in. We have a few choises:
A - A basically deterministic world where at least physical things like gambling are just a chain of causes and effects.
In this case, probability is just an useful tool to us, but is just a model with no deeper insight in how things really are.
B - A world where events on our scale are completely random and it's impossible to know what will happen until it happens.
In this case, probability is still an useful tool to us, and a way to accurately describe the truth of our reality.
C - A world where events are deterministic but humans have a non-deterministic mind with at least some random elements.
In this case, probability is still an useful tool to us, but it is completely missleading as a way to describe the world around us.