Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,912 Year: 4,169/9,624 Month: 1,040/974 Week: 367/286 Day: 10/13 Hour: 1/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   A young sun - a response
sidelined
Member (Idle past 5938 days)
Posts: 3435
From: Edmonton Alberta Canada
Joined: 08-30-2003


Message 30 of 308 (68436)
11-21-2003 7:04 PM
Reply to: Message 28 by NosyNed
11-21-2003 6:45 PM


Re: What's Normal?
NosyNed
Here is a website for the lithium question.
The Solar FAQ: Solar Neutrinos and Other Solar Oddities
I hope this helps.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 28 by NosyNed, posted 11-21-2003 6:45 PM NosyNed has not replied

sidelined
Member (Idle past 5938 days)
Posts: 3435
From: Edmonton Alberta Canada
Joined: 08-30-2003


Message 49 of 308 (68685)
11-22-2003 10:44 PM
Reply to: Message 48 by Lizard Breath
11-22-2003 10:36 PM


Re: An open question for MrHambre
LB
Allow me to enlighten as I recently had this same problem.In your profile place your quotation in the area provided .Then when you click reply to a persons post you will see a Options button beneath that says show signature.
P.S. shook my faith too

This message is a reply to:
 Message 48 by Lizard Breath, posted 11-22-2003 10:36 PM Lizard Breath has not replied

sidelined
Member (Idle past 5938 days)
Posts: 3435
From: Edmonton Alberta Canada
Joined: 08-30-2003


Message 142 of 308 (69999)
11-30-2003 12:00 AM
Reply to: Message 141 by Buzsaw
11-29-2003 11:46 PM


Re: Buzsaw you have me confused as to your intent.
buzsaw
Am I correct in assuming that,since a star that has just begun its lifetime and is not yet emitting light,that this somehow "proves" our star is young because it is obviously today giving off light?
I do hope I am misunderstanding this.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 141 by Buzsaw, posted 11-29-2003 11:46 PM Buzsaw has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 151 by Buzsaw, posted 11-30-2003 3:12 PM sidelined has not replied

sidelined
Member (Idle past 5938 days)
Posts: 3435
From: Edmonton Alberta Canada
Joined: 08-30-2003


Message 146 of 308 (70063)
11-30-2003 12:16 PM
Reply to: Message 145 by Deadly Ramon
11-30-2003 1:29 AM


Re: Prominent Creationist Organization that Doesn't Use the Missing Neutrinos Argument
DR
I must say I am impressed by the level of work done in AIG,however I find constant backpedaling of aplogetics dishonest. there is one point in the book of joshua that I wish to dispute since they snuck out from under it,I believe,because it is a difficult question. I also found some erroneous work on the physics side of their arguements.Unfortunately they operate only through snail mail so it will be a long time before any issue acould be sorted out.Damn shame becuase I have asked this same question here on the forum and not recieved any response.
From AIG.
c. Some form of light refraction appears to have been what happened in the reign of Hezekiah when the shadow on Ahaz’s sundial retreated ten degrees (2 Kings 20:11)an event that appears to have occurred only in the land of Palestine (2 Chronicles 32:31).
What a line of B.S. since for one it would hardly equate to a miracle or even something special.Why mention it if it has no bearing on the context of the story.It is my opinion that they refused to tackle it since it is not mentioned by any other nation of people anywhere in the world of that time.Also missing is an explanation of the physical effect of the earth moving backwards in order to accomodate this phenomena without the destruction that would ensue.
[This message has been edited by sidelined, 11-30-2003]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 145 by Deadly Ramon, posted 11-30-2003 1:29 AM Deadly Ramon has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 175 by Deadly Ramon, posted 12-01-2003 4:21 PM sidelined has not replied

sidelined
Member (Idle past 5938 days)
Posts: 3435
From: Edmonton Alberta Canada
Joined: 08-30-2003


Message 148 of 308 (70076)
11-30-2003 2:44 PM
Reply to: Message 147 by Buzsaw
11-30-2003 2:35 PM


Re: NED AND ETA'S UNSCRUPULOUS EVASIVE TACTICS SUMARIZED:
Buz
Short reminder to please respond to my post 142.thanks.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 147 by Buzsaw, posted 11-30-2003 2:35 PM Buzsaw has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024