Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,905 Year: 4,162/9,624 Month: 1,033/974 Week: 360/286 Day: 3/13 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   A young sun - a response
docpotato
Member (Idle past 5077 days)
Posts: 334
From: Portland, OR
Joined: 07-18-2003


Message 21 of 308 (68341)
11-21-2003 1:57 PM
Reply to: Message 18 by Lizard Breath
11-21-2003 12:53 PM


Re: How our Sun holds itself together
Lizard Breath,
Your commitment to finding the truth is admirable. Here is the distinct difference I (and others) see between ICR and other scientists.
ICR scientists follow these tenents that are found on this page.
Just taking one of these shows us the problem with believing in their methods of research. For instance:
"The phenomenon of biological life did not develop by natural processes from inanimate systems but was specially and supernaturally created by the Creator."
So the hypothetical question you MUST ask yourself if you want to give this organization any scientific credence whatsoever is, "what would they do if they found evidence that was contrary to this very basic tenant?"
I can't answer that question, but things seem fishy based on the evidence we have already seen in this thread.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 18 by Lizard Breath, posted 11-21-2003 12:53 PM Lizard Breath has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 62 by Brad McFall, posted 11-24-2003 12:36 PM docpotato has replied

docpotato
Member (Idle past 5077 days)
Posts: 334
From: Portland, OR
Joined: 07-18-2003


Message 105 of 308 (69596)
11-27-2003 11:21 AM
Reply to: Message 62 by Brad McFall
11-24-2003 12:36 PM


Re: How our Sun holds together
Brad,
I have not confused Method and Principle. In the case of ICR, their principles define their methods. If their principles are to believe the bible first, no matter what, then they are suspect. That IS a blight to this potato.
Doc

This message is a reply to:
 Message 62 by Brad McFall, posted 11-24-2003 12:36 PM Brad McFall has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 135 by Brad McFall, posted 11-29-2003 3:48 PM docpotato has not replied

docpotato
Member (Idle past 5077 days)
Posts: 334
From: Portland, OR
Joined: 07-18-2003


Message 279 of 308 (73789)
12-17-2003 2:04 PM
Reply to: Message 272 by Itachi Uchiha
12-17-2003 12:17 PM


ah fables!
The two characters continue arguing until finally Sutano proposes the idea that their OLDER BROTHER named Godato was writing the note but passed out before he could finish signing his name. Sutano shows Fulano the passed out body and several examples of handwriting that match up with the note revealing that the evidence does seem to indicate that Godato was the one who wrote the note. He even shows some dried milk on Godato's face and some ice cream under his fingernails. Then, in a rage of fury, Fulano cries that Sutano is wrong and that god wrote the note becuase it said God wrote it and then stabs Sutano with a butcher knife for not respecting the almighty.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 272 by Itachi Uchiha, posted 12-17-2003 12:17 PM Itachi Uchiha has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024