You are.

I worry about getting off topic, but while your concept is correct, it is technically incorrect. Computers make decisions based on:
is A < B
is A = B
is A > B
and combinations thereof. Truth or false has implications beyond what I think you intended.However, we (programmers, software engineers) are learning to put together combinations of these comparisons in ever new manners. We are learning ways to generate probabilities then throw in a toss of the dice according to the calculated probabilities. (to over simplify) The result is computer programming that can sometimes be (intentionally) unpredictable and can come up with the right answer for unknown reasons. In other words, we are aproaching the point of computers being able to make pragmatic decisions. There is much more but that is way off topic.

Re: These aren't choices that can easily be settled by true/false decisions.I completely agree. (and I was a bit pedantic in my protest) Just laying out the concepts that can go into those kinds of decisions still remain beyond our ability. This is part of the reason that we are so far from the realization of a computer or any artificial device with a sense of self.We do have computer systems that can be called expert systems in that thay possess the knowledge (rules to be more precise) to perform compex tasks. But in my opinion, we have not reached the point of being able to create AI (Artificial Intelligence). No computer can sense and form a comprehension of someting it has never "seen" before and incorporate new rules and insructions into its programming to deal with that new something.The brain is thousands if not many millions of simple computers put together in marvelously complex patterns to create, returning to the topic, I AM and YOU ARE.