I see a bit of a problem with this as it seems to me that the way in which we know things is by relating them to other things.
Well, there's the speed of light...
If .9999...9 is equal to 1 then non-zero chances can largely be dismissed.
By adding the terminal 9, by the way, you make that first bit untrue.
Nevertheless, we can choose to dismiss whatever we like, it doesn't make them go away, though. We can say God created the Earth and the universe etc in 6 days and that I know this absolutely, and then simply dismiss things which have non-zero chances of being true that challenge my 'knowledge'. If we want we could do that kind of thing.
The same way that I can dismiss the non-zero possibility that I can walk through a wall. In the real world the possibility that I can walk through a wall is zero. I know this.
Then you're wrong.
Look - forget the extreme philosophical examples for a moment.
You have a head injury. You wake up and next to you see someone who looks like your mother/wife/sister/brother/father whatever, but it isn't them. They do sound like them. And they've studied them well based on the content of their speech. But it isn't them. They assure you they are who they appear to be. They have your loved one's passport, the imposters! Then more imposters from your friends and family turn up.
This is your perception of reality. Its how things are from your perspective.
They tell you about the head injury and
Capgras Delusion, but they're clearly just trying to trick you for some reason. Are they CIA? CSIS? Aliens?
quote:
As a starting point I would like to dispute the idea that imagining a reality that is in opposition to what we observe is a valid objection to the idea that we can be sure of what we observe.
You observe imposters - can you be sure of that or do you have Capgras syndrome? I'm saying reality is in opposition to what you observe. I think this is a valid objection to the idea that we can be sure of what we observe.
If you want to get picky about 'observation' you are free to replace my example with some kind of hallucinatory condition instead.