Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 69 (9101 total)
8 online now:
Newest Member: sensei
Happy Birthday: AlexCaledin
Post Volume: Total: 904,183 Year: 1,064/14,231 Month: 1,064/1,514 Week: 97/234 Day: 30/48 Hour: 0/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Evolution and the seven Christian hypothesis on Creation ought all be taught
Larni
Member (Idle past 190 days)
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


(1)
Message 14 of 100 (690255)
02-11-2013 8:43 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by kofh2u
02-10-2013 12:58 PM


I have to say I would not like my kids to grow up being taught things that are unscientific (such as 1-7).
Teaching kids that universe runs on magic is not helpful to them.
ABE: as I recall from my Sociology Religion is a major component. Kids can learn all about the affects of religion on society; just like I did.
Edited by Larni, : ABE

The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286
Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by kofh2u, posted 02-10-2013 12:58 PM kofh2u has not replied

  
Larni
Member (Idle past 190 days)
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 48 of 100 (690943)
02-18-2013 8:20 AM
Reply to: Message 27 by kofh2u
02-14-2013 8:41 AM


Psychology and Sociological research follows the scientific method; making them science.
Creationism does not fit the description of science.

The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286
Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134

This message is a reply to:
 Message 27 by kofh2u, posted 02-14-2013 8:41 AM kofh2u has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 52 by kofh2u, posted 02-18-2013 12:15 PM Larni has replied

  
Larni
Member (Idle past 190 days)
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 54 of 100 (690960)
02-18-2013 12:40 PM
Reply to: Message 52 by kofh2u
02-18-2013 12:15 PM


Of course psychology is empirical. What part of psychological research is not empirical?
Every piece of psychological research has a hypothesis. What piece of psychological research does not have a H0?
I find it astounding that you can use the word 'conjecture' without irony.

The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286
Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134

This message is a reply to:
 Message 52 by kofh2u, posted 02-18-2013 12:15 PM kofh2u has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 55 by kofh2u, posted 02-18-2013 6:35 PM Larni has replied

  
Larni
Member (Idle past 190 days)
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 60 of 100 (691013)
02-19-2013 6:18 AM
Reply to: Message 55 by kofh2u
02-18-2013 6:35 PM


Re: LOL... conjecture...
Your sources are wrong. You ignore my questions.
Please show one piece of psychological research which is not empirical.
You do know I've been contributing to this site since 2005? I'm not sure what the 'keep posting here' remark refers too.
Thanks.

The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286
Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134

This message is a reply to:
 Message 55 by kofh2u, posted 02-18-2013 6:35 PM kofh2u has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2022 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.1
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2023