Evolution and the seven Christian hypothesis on Creation ought all be taught

Seven plus One eh? Clever. Not biting on that troll bait. You are going to have to work a little harder to generate traffic to your web page.

Let's assume just for argument that the preference for more than two kingdoms is a choice. Why do bacteria and yeast belong in the plant kingdom? That choice simply cannot be justified. Where did anaerobic organisms belong?

What kind of stupid game are you playing? Your chart does not show any bacteria. I'm a fool for paying this bunk any attention. That folly ends now.

Actually none of us are calling Genesis vague. Most of the people you are arguing with have a specific meaning of the literal words of Genesis in mind. For example, I understand that Genesis describes a global flood of water actually lifting the keel of Noah's ark above the highest mountain.You are the one trying to make the Bible literal and inerrant by making it vague. According to you, no one can actually determine what the Bible says until a scientist uncovers evidence.If your method were of interpretation were correct, I would expect you to drop this Nostradamus style faux-prophesying and to instead read the Bible and announce some scientific knowledge in advance of science discovering it (or at least in advance of you knowing about it).

Stop making up stuff and assigning it to me.I haven't argued any such thing. Your two proposals are not the only options. I can easily think of several others. My personal belief, which I have not made any attempt to argue for, is that the flood story is meant to describe man's relation to God, and that the story need not be true to accomplish that goal. No I'm not.