Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 69 (9101 total)
10 online now:
Newest Member: sensei
Happy Birthday: AlexCaledin
Post Volume: Total: 904,181 Year: 1,062/14,231 Month: 1,062/1,514 Week: 95/234 Day: 28/48 Hour: 1/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Evolution and the seven Christian hypothesis on Creation ought all be taught
herebedragons
Member (Idle past 345 days)
Posts: 1517
From: Michigan
Joined: 11-22-2009


(2)
Message 38 of 100 (690850)
02-16-2013 8:52 PM
Reply to: Message 32 by kofh2u
02-15-2013 11:30 AM


Is this what you propose to teach?
It is clear that Genesis mentions ONLY plants and animals, so it infers the Two Kingdom System.
The two kingdom system was abandoned because organisms could not be classified appropriately into only two kingdoms. Modern classification systems recognize 6 kingdoms organized into 3 domains. I don't think Genesis was intended to be a reference book on classification systems.
It is clear that none of the six different systems of Taxonomy is perfect, and the choice to use one or the other is subjectively a decision of the individual who might so do for purposes that seem satisfactory for their intend use.
No, it is true. No taxonomic system is perfect, not because of subjectivity but because of the extreme complexity and diversity of living things.
Bacteria which has cell walls falls into the category of the Plant Kingdom using the Two Kingdom System.
Wrong. Most bacteria use peptidoglycans in their cell walls while plants use cellulose. Two different structures.
The animals alway breath in oxygen,
You do realize that plants "breath in oxygen" too, right? Plants, animals and fungi all perform cellular respiration using oxygen.
separated by the respiration of CO2 in the former
Did you know that plants do not respirate CO2? They produce sugars through photosynthesis by fixing atmospheric CO2.
and use of chloroplast for photosynthesis.
There are some animals as well that use chloroplasts to fix carbon. Additionally several Protista do as well. Is a Euglena a plant or an animal?
and must ingest protein and sugars they can not manufacture.
Most bacteria (not all) are hetrotrophs (need to ingest food) so would they be classified as an animal? But they have a cell wall ... so maybe a plant?
Honestly, I am not sure what point you were trying to make here, but maybe you should learn some of these introductory level biological concepts before you try to tackle more difficult concepts
HBD
Edited by herebedragons, : No reason given.

Whoever calls me ignorant shares my own opinion. Sorrowfully and tacitly I recognize my ignorance, when I consider how much I lack of what my mind in its craving for knowledge is sighing for. But until the end of the present exile has come and terminated this our imperfection by which "we know in part," I console myself with the consideration that this belongs to our common nature. - Francesco Petrarca
"Nothing is easier than to persuade people who want to be persuaded and already believe." - another Petrarca gem.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 32 by kofh2u, posted 02-15-2013 11:30 AM kofh2u has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 39 by Eli, posted 02-17-2013 2:10 AM herebedragons has not replied
 Message 41 by kofh2u, posted 02-17-2013 7:00 AM herebedragons has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2022 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.1
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2023