Is ID scientific ? Yet another approach to the question.

I guess I don't understand that reasoning - no intelligence that we're aware of is able to design something that even approaches the complexity of a single living cell.Therefore - intelligence must have done it!I don't get it. If the best intelligences we're aware of can't even get us halfway there, isn't that a pretty good indication that something other than intelligence was responsible in the first place? Well, I'll make a deal with you. Us evolutionists will stop calling creationists and ID'ists liars for Jesus and religiously motivated as soon as you can get the creationists and ID'ists to stop referring to use evolutionists as "godless", "amoral", "haters of God's authority", "rapists and murderers", "arrogant", "small-minded", "blinded by assumptions", "sinners deserving of death", and other charming terms.Oh, and you have to get them to stop lying for Jesus, too. If you can do all that we'll play nicey-nice with the creationists. After all they did start it.

It's not just weird, it's false. Studies show that, at least in America, around half of all scientists believe in the existence of God.But you'll rarely find even an atheist who denies the possibility of God; it's the reality of God that we don't accept.Other than that, though, the reasoning in your post bears absolutely no resemblance to any reliable process by which we might determine what is accurate and what is not.

That's great, but how is any of that a response to my post 21, which you replied to?And if you didn't mean to respond to my points, why did you reply to my post? Are you sure you're in the right thread for your questions?