Totally Off Topic. Do not respond to this post.
trying to bypass the Proposed New Topic procedure by spamming your PNT can result in your permissions being suspended
How did they started it? Darwinism was the one who started it?
I posted on a proposed new topic and I got no comment on it but I will say it again...
I don't get why it is still even being debated about "IF" the Darwin theory is true? It is almost strange to me how people just deliberately ignore the "facts" and the "laws" of nature in order to believe in "Darwinian Evolution".
*Non-living matter does "not" reproduce. Non-living matter does not produce "living matter". So how can anyone logically even fathom such an idea. Evidence pointing to creation.
*The earth's magnetic field's decay rate is perfect evidence that the earth is only 1,000's of years old. Scientists know that if the earth was older than 10,000 years everything would have melted away. No life would have been able to exist under such an intense magnetic field. ( evidence the earth is less than 10,000 years)
*The atmosphere's helium content is evidence to the earth's youth. Helium escapes at a much slower rate than it enters the earth's atmosphere...if all of earth's helium came from the rocks decay byproduct(and all of it didn't) the earth could not be any older than 1 to 2 million years old. Since fusion also produces helium it is actually as the magnetic field shows us much younger.
* Whale skeletons on mountains? Sea snail fossils on top of mountains? Sea creature bones and fossils on various land parts of the world? Fossils of fish still with prey in its mouth? Fossils of animals in the act of giving birth? (Obvious evidence of Noah's flood and rapid burial...and not slow and long Darwinian evolutionary process)
*DNA begins to decay after one dies. Scientists agree that at the rate DNA decays there would be no traceable DNA left after about 10,000 years. Darwin didn't know this of course...as they hadn't discovered this yet...unfossilized dinosaur bones as well as fossilized show traceble DNA. (less than 10,000 years old)
*Carbon14 decays at a decay rate that there would be no tracebable C14 in 40,000 years. Dinosaur fossils and unfossilized bones have traceable C14. (less than 40,000 years old)
* Red-blood cells also decay at a rate that there would be no more traceable red-blood cells after 10,000 years. Dinosaur bones have been found with red-blood cells. ( evidence that the dinosaurs are less than 10,000 years old)
* Haley's comet wouldn't still be coming around if it passed through our solar system anymore than 10,000 years...it has a portion of it melted away every time it passes by our sun.
Conclusion: Evidences point to what the Bible has recorded. Evidences are against "Darwinian Evolution". There is obvious design and purpose as well as purposeful function in all of creation.
So why is this still even being debated? Why is this Darwinian myth so die-hard? It is even more RELIGIOUSLY motivated than anything else I've heard of. This puzzles me. Any comments?
This message has been edited by AdminJar, 09-17-2005 07:05 PM
™ Version 4.2