Stragger writes:
Buz writes:
The only model of the BB expansion I've ever known is a balloon, which is a 2d one supposedly modeling a 3d Universe. That does not model my statement describing the BB. Is that all you have? Are there any others, or is your illogical abstract theory bankrupt bunk I don't know of any.
Mathematical models Buz.
The dude has just told you all that he knows about the BB models. Do you think you are going to be able to walk said man through tensor calculus?
In other posts he details his complete and utter disdain for anybody who has learned more or taught more science than he knows. In his mind, his own ignorance of geology, physics, biology, and all things scientific is evidence of his superiority to you. Surely you've seen those posts yourself.
Why would anyone give a rip what this fool thinks? As one person has already put it, the man is a parody of himself.
This thread is proceeding in a similar way to that thread on population models, where Buz suggested that some population model reflected reality better than those models based on humans having existed for hundreds of thousands of years.
In the end, Buz presented absolutely no math and no basis for making any comparisons. In fact, he admitted that he was in no way capable of evaluating mathematical population models. Has he suggested any method of determining compatibility with the laws of thermodynamics other than his own personal preferences?
Not that I can see.
™ Version 4.2
(1)
