Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,910 Year: 4,167/9,624 Month: 1,038/974 Week: 365/286 Day: 8/13 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Which More 3LoT Compatible, Cavediver's Temp.Non-ID Or Buzsaw's Infinite ID Universe
Coyote
Member (Idle past 2136 days)
Posts: 6117
Joined: 01-12-2008


Message 13 of 304 (621867)
06-29-2011 11:09 AM
Reply to: Message 12 by Buzsaw
06-29-2011 11:02 AM


Re: Buz on science
What you people appear to be really afraid for is that I know too much real science for you to risk a Great Debate between me and your best player. No?
No.

Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 12 by Buzsaw, posted 06-29-2011 11:02 AM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Coyote
Member (Idle past 2136 days)
Posts: 6117
Joined: 01-12-2008


Message 49 of 304 (622055)
06-30-2011 10:40 AM
Reply to: Message 47 by Buzsaw
06-30-2011 10:18 AM


Re: Clarification Of Topic
The topic should not be restricted to a secularistic application of science.
There is no other kind of science.
And your wishing and pretending won't change this.

Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 47 by Buzsaw, posted 06-30-2011 10:18 AM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Coyote
Member (Idle past 2136 days)
Posts: 6117
Joined: 01-12-2008


Message 89 of 304 (622510)
07-04-2011 11:15 AM
Reply to: Message 88 by Buzsaw
07-04-2011 9:20 AM


Re: Multi-verse versus Uni-verse
The multi-verse concept definitely runs contrary to the Biblical record, as I have explained. There is no Biblical references to support it.
That's a pretty silly guide to use.
There are no mentions of computers either.

Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 88 by Buzsaw, posted 07-04-2011 9:20 AM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Coyote
Member (Idle past 2136 days)
Posts: 6117
Joined: 01-12-2008


Message 184 of 304 (643438)
12-06-2011 10:45 PM
Reply to: Message 183 by Buzsaw
12-06-2011 10:31 PM


Changing the definition of science, are we?
Because it is science; just not totally secularist in nature.
Buz, please cite some references for us, from appropriate peer-reviewed journals, where science does anything that is not "totally secularist in nature."
And please, leave the creationist websites out of this. They lie.

Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 183 by Buzsaw, posted 12-06-2011 10:31 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Coyote
Member (Idle past 2136 days)
Posts: 6117
Joined: 01-12-2008


Message 262 of 304 (644534)
12-18-2011 9:19 PM
Reply to: Message 261 by Buzsaw
12-18-2011 9:01 PM


Science, a profitable hobby?
Buz, you really should stop tinkering with science unless you are willing to learn something about it first.
First, you have no talent for it.
Second, your approach is the exact opposite of real science. You are not looking for answers, you are trying to force your religious beliefs into a scientific framework. They don't fit.
Third, for those of who do know something about various fields of science it is very painful to watch you floundering about.
Fourth, you're not convincing anyone. You're just making yourself and your cause look foolish.
======
The truth of our faith becomes a matter of ridicule among the infidels if any Catholic, not gifted with the necessary scientific learning, presents as dogma what scientific scrutiny shows to be false.
― Thomas Aquinas

Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 261 by Buzsaw, posted 12-18-2011 9:01 PM Buzsaw has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 268 by Buzsaw, posted 12-18-2011 11:48 PM Coyote has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024