Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 0/368 Day: 0/11 Hour: 0/0


EvC Forum ⇒ Science Forums ⇒ Is It Science? ⇒

The New Cosmology of Mr. Mayer

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The New Cosmology of Mr. Mayer
fearandloathing
Member (Idle past 4175 days)
Posts: 990
From: Burlington, NC, USA
Joined: 02-24-2011

Normal Thread Display
Message 13 of 90 (614643)
05-05-2011 3:09 PM 		Reply to: Message 8 by Percy
05-05-2011 12:43 PM

Percy writes:
​
Does Mayer's theory differ from general relativity in its predictions of the effects of a spinning object on the geometry of space?
​
--Percy
Hi Percy,
​
Don't know if you have seen this
​
It dose not answer your question, but it does support general relativity.
​
"I hate to advocate the use of drugs, alcohol, violence, or insanity to anyone, but they always worked for me." - Hunter S. Thompson
​
Ad astra per aspera
This message is a reply to:
 Message 8 by Percy, posted 05-05-2011 12:43 PM Percy has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 14 by Percy, posted 05-05-2011 3:19 PM fearandloathing has replied
  
fearandloathing
Member (Idle past 4175 days)
Posts: 990
From: Burlington, NC, USA
Joined: 02-24-2011

Normal Thread Display
Message 15 of 90 (614650)
05-05-2011 3:36 PM 		Reply to: Message 14 by Percy
05-05-2011 3:19 PM

Black holes, says Mayer, are actually the "in" end of a tunnel through spacetime (ie a wormhole) which leads to the opposite side of the universe. And at that end one finds a "white hole" spewing forth raw energy and fundamental particles. Dead star goes in, elemental ingredients come out. That means 100% recycling of material and energy, occurring everywhere in the universe, for all eternity. Can't get much more sustainable than that.
​
I find this interesting, as far as I can tell, it is accepted that white holes cannot be formed by gravitational collapse, if there are any then they would be remnants of the big bang. If this is true then Mayer cannot be right. There should be evidence of white holes in the same proportion as black holes if you believe Mayer, yet there is no evidence of them, they are only theoretically possible.
​
Edited by fearandloathing, : No reason given.
​
"I hate to advocate the use of drugs, alcohol, violence, or insanity to anyone, but they always worked for me." - Hunter S. Thompson
​
Ad astra per aspera
This message is a reply to:
 Message 14 by Percy, posted 05-05-2011 3:19 PM Percy has seen this message but not replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 20 by cavediver, posted 05-06-2011 4:02 AM fearandloathing has not replied
  
fearandloathing
Member (Idle past 4175 days)
Posts: 990
From: Burlington, NC, USA
Joined: 02-24-2011

Normal Thread Display
Message 58 of 90 (615067)
05-09-2011 10:55 PM 		Reply to: Message 57 by Alfred Maddenstein
05-09-2011 10:14 PM

Re: When does the discussion start?
alf writes:
​
Your claim that cosmologists disagree with me that there is no expansion is a poor inductive reasoning. Some do disagree and some do not
​
Which cosmologist support a constant state universe??
​
"I hate to advocate the use of drugs, alcohol, violence, or insanity to anyone, but they always worked for me." - Hunter S. Thompson
​
Ad astra per aspera
This message is a reply to:
 Message 57 by Alfred Maddenstein, posted 05-09-2011 10:14 PM Alfred Maddenstein has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 62 by Alfred Maddenstein, posted 05-10-2011 9:07 AM fearandloathing has not replied
  
fearandloathing
Member (Idle past 4175 days)
Posts: 990
From: Burlington, NC, USA
Joined: 02-24-2011

Normal Thread Display
Message 71 of 90 (615162)
05-10-2011 9:47 PM 		Reply to: Message 69 by Oli
05-10-2011 6:00 PM

Oli writes:
​
The point was that there is a lot of Hydrogen and Helium in the universe, but stars are constantly burning these elements into heavier ones. If the universe had been around forever, wouldn't most of the Hydrogen and Helium already have been burnt up?
​
That is where this falls into play
​
Black holes, says Mayer, are actually the "in" end of a tunnel through spacetime (ie a wormhole) which leads to the opposite side of the universe. And at that end one finds a "white hole" spewing forth raw energy and fundamental particles. Dead star goes in, elemental ingredients come out. That means 100% recycling of material and energy, occurring everywhere in the universe, for all eternity. Can't get much more sustainable than that.
​
I just don't see evidence of this happening on a scale that would allow Mayer's to be correct
​
"I hate to advocate the use of drugs, alcohol, violence, or insanity to anyone, but they always worked for me." - Hunter S. Thompson
​
Ad astra per aspera
This message is a reply to:
 Message 69 by Oli, posted 05-10-2011 6:00 PM Oli has not replied
  
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024