Alfred Maddenstein writes:
As to his graphs and predictions, you can check them all if you want. He himself does not claim to be perfectly certain but is saying that all has to be tested experimentally.
So this could only mean that you misspoke when you said that current theory was inconsistent with observations, and that you further misspoke when you claimed that Mayer's theory better matches observations. And now you're saying the exact opposite, that Mayer's ideas have yet to be tested against observations. What would those tests be?
I suggest you stop suggesting that I go check out Mayer for myself. I'm discussing with you, not Mayer. You're here to make the best case for Mayer you can. The rest of us are, if they're like me, waiting to see if you will say anything about Mayer that doesn't sound like empty hype. You should be writing advertising copy for crystal water Internet sites.
--Percy