ID man, you have abandoned a thread where you have questions waiting for you.
It's message #103 in the "ID as Religion" topic.
The most important part is the following. In particular, I would most like to see an exampple of where the filter has been used to detect design in a Biological system.
Does Dembski's filter specifically answer this problem; the fact that it may be true that we will never find the explanation for a system which is, noneltheless, natural in origin, simply because we never think of it, not because it isn't natural in origin?
How can I tell the difference between an Intellgently Designed system and a natural one that we:
1) Do not currently understand but will in the future, or
2) Do not have the capacity to ever understand?
If this is explained specifically somewhere in a link to Dembski's design filter, perhaps you could point me to it?
Or perhaps you could describe or link to an example of where this filter has been applied to a biological system and detected Intelligent Design?
™ Version 4.2