Its hard for me to believe that "most" scientists have no knowledge of the discipline they are in.
To be honest I don't know any Scientists, I only know Chemists, Biologists and Geologists. Actually it's not even as general as that. I only know experts in Flavonoid synthesis, mollusc behaviour and undersea oil extraction.
The further you go in academic training, the more specialised you become. What you become expert in is a particular very specialized field, not the whole of Science. Your opinion on questions about that field is to be valued, but you can't claim a special knowledge about the rest of Science.
I'd also argue that a science education by itself tends to make an individual less skilled in reasoning than an education in the humanities or social sciences. Science training is generally focused on learning facts and principles, and on showing that you've learnt those facts and principles, rather than on putting together a reasonable argument for a case.
It's only self-education outside of the academic training that can make a scientist informed and skilled enough to put together a decent argument. And if a scientist can educate himself in these skills, then so can anyone else.
The true mystery of the world is the visible, not the invisible