Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,906 Year: 4,163/9,624 Month: 1,034/974 Week: 361/286 Day: 4/13 Hour: 1/0


EvC Forum ⇒ Science Forums ⇒ Geology and the Great Flood ⇒

Mt. Ararat Anomaly

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Mt. Ararat Anomaly
roxrkool
Member (Idle past 1018 days)
Posts: 1497
From: Nevada
Joined: 03-23-2003

Normal Thread Display
Message 37 of 97 (196784)
04-04-2005 11:09 PM 		Reply to: Message 31 by SonClad
04-04-2005 8:20 PM

Re: Noah's Ark
Maybe my eyes are bad... I didn't see a thing in those photos.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 31 by SonClad, posted 04-04-2005 8:20 PM SonClad has not replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 40 by NosyNed, posted 04-04-2005 11:47 PM roxrkool has not replied
  
roxrkool
Member (Idle past 1018 days)
Posts: 1497
From: Nevada
Joined: 03-23-2003

Normal Thread Display
Message 38 of 97 (196789)
04-04-2005 11:38 PM 		Reply to: Message 26 by SonClad
04-04-2005 7:32 PM

Re: Noah's Ark?
Come on now. We all know it wasn't solid rock that was eroded at Mount St. Helens, but unconsolidated material in the form of landslides, lahars, tephra deposits, ash, etc.
​
The bottom line is that 4,000 year old eye witness testimony is the ONLY line of evidence that supports the flood myth. Eye witness testimony isn't even all that great when it's a month old... or even days or hours. Ask any crime investigator. What IS solid evidence is the physical remnants of events/occurrences.
​
So please, let's not start that "if you weren't there, then you can't say for certain" rubbish.
​
As others have stated, even if some ark was found, it doesn't prove the flood. You're still left with the wrong geology.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 26 by SonClad, posted 04-04-2005 7:32 PM SonClad has not replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 39 by AdminJar, posted 04-04-2005 11:42 PM roxrkool has not replied
  
roxrkool
Member (Idle past 1018 days)
Posts: 1497
From: Nevada
Joined: 03-23-2003

Normal Thread Display
Message 73 of 97 (227219)
07-29-2005 12:25 AM 		Reply to: Message 72 by Chiroptera
07-27-2005 9:33 PM

Re: Anybodies Ark.
Or what if Mt. Ararat in Turkey was simply named after the Ararat Mountains in the Bible?
​
I wonder how many ranges have been named 'Ararat' since Noah's story was first told.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 72 by Chiroptera, posted 07-27-2005 9:33 PM Chiroptera has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 74 by Chiroptera, posted 07-29-2005 12:25 PM roxrkool has replied
  
roxrkool
Member (Idle past 1018 days)
Posts: 1497
From: Nevada
Joined: 03-23-2003

Normal Thread Display
Message 75 of 97 (227466)
07-29-2005 3:45 PM 		Reply to: Message 74 by Chiroptera
07-29-2005 12:25 PM

Re: Anybodies Ark.
Chiroptera writes:
​
I guess that Mt. Ararat could be anywhere in the world.
That's what I was thinking. Noah could have landed in Antarctica for all we know.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 74 by Chiroptera, posted 07-29-2005 12:25 PM Chiroptera has not replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 76 by Yaro, posted 07-30-2005 1:37 PM roxrkool has not replied
  
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024