Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 368/286 Day: 11/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Mt. Ararat Anomaly
daaaaaBEAR
Inactive Member


Message 1 of 97 (184248)
02-09-2005 8:43 PM


Many may be familiar with part of the account of Noah's Ark in Genesis:
Genesis 8:1-5
(1) But God remembered Noah and all the wild animals and the livestock that were with him in the ark, and he sent a wind over the earth, and the waters receded. (2) Now the springs of the deep and the floodgates of the heavens had been closed, and the rain had stopped falling from the sky. (3) The water receded steadily from the earth. At the end of the hundred and fifty days the water had gone down, (4) and on the seventeenth day of the seventh month the ark came to rest on the mountains of Ararat. (5) The waters continued to recede until the tenth month, and on the first day of the tenth month the tops of the mountains became visible.
With emphasis on the 4th verse I researched multiple Mt. Ararat sightings that made claims of an intrigueing anomaly (a structural abnormality that is not common to a mountain) on the top of the mountain.
This document gives an account of some historical sightings of Noah's Ark on Mt. Ararat:
Noah's Ark Search - Mount Ararat
I believe this is a significant support for the accuracy of the account in Genesis and would like to hear any other evidence of the Ark or relating posts on this topic.
This message has been edited by daaaaaBEAR, 02-09-2005 20:44 AM

Replies to this message:
 Message 5 by nator, posted 02-09-2005 9:32 PM daaaaaBEAR has replied
 Message 6 by arachnophilia, posted 02-09-2005 9:35 PM daaaaaBEAR has replied
 Message 15 by JonF, posted 02-10-2005 9:13 AM daaaaaBEAR has not replied

  
daaaaaBEAR
Inactive Member


Message 3 of 97 (184256)
02-09-2005 9:06 PM
Reply to: Message 2 by AdminAsgara
02-09-2005 8:47 PM


actually I would like it in Bible Accuracy and Innerancy if that's alright. This thread doesn't seem as active.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 2 by AdminAsgara, posted 02-09-2005 8:47 PM AdminAsgara has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 4 by AdminAsgara, posted 02-09-2005 9:14 PM daaaaaBEAR has not replied

  
daaaaaBEAR
Inactive Member


Message 7 of 97 (184288)
02-09-2005 11:19 PM
Reply to: Message 5 by nator
02-09-2005 9:32 PM


Have any actual independent, non-Creationist or non religious credible professional Archaeologists examined this evidence, or is it only fundamentalist, YEC Christians making these claims?
How do you know the photo is biased? That particular photo isn't the best example. There are others on the same site. Obviously no non-religious organization would even bring up the issue of the ark so the only source left to criticize is that of Christian associations. If you care to look for other pictures of the ark on google there are better pictures that are much more convincing.
maybe the same book but different accounts from different people at different times.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by nator, posted 02-09-2005 9:32 PM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 17 by nator, posted 02-11-2005 8:23 AM daaaaaBEAR has not replied

  
daaaaaBEAR
Inactive Member


Message 8 of 97 (184292)
02-09-2005 11:46 PM
Reply to: Message 6 by arachnophilia
02-09-2005 9:35 PM


Re: plurality
mountains. plural.
and..... so it's one of the mountains of Ararat and one of the mountains is the possible site of the Ark in the Bible.
here are some better pictures:
http://dejnarde.ms11.net//enltwo.htm
http://dejnarde.ms11.net//enlthree.htm
http://arksearch.com/napublic.htm
here's a archaelogical research site:
http://www.wyattmuseum.com/noahs-ark.htm
and a national geographic article if your looking for unbiased, i did find one:
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/...7_040427_noahsark.html
This message has been edited by daaaaaBEAR, 02-09-2005 23:53 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 6 by arachnophilia, posted 02-09-2005 9:35 PM arachnophilia has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 9 by jar, posted 02-09-2005 11:52 PM daaaaaBEAR has replied
 Message 11 by NosyNed, posted 02-10-2005 12:00 AM daaaaaBEAR has not replied
 Message 13 by NosyNed, posted 02-10-2005 12:13 AM daaaaaBEAR has not replied
 Message 16 by arachnophilia, posted 02-10-2005 10:38 PM daaaaaBEAR has not replied

  
daaaaaBEAR
Inactive Member


Message 10 of 97 (184294)
02-10-2005 12:00 AM
Reply to: Message 9 by jar
02-09-2005 11:52 PM


Re: plurality
did you look at the arksearch one? picture 21, and others i don't think are artistic renderings.
and speaking of artistic rendering I believe evolutionists have had their fair share of pictures hoaxes.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 9 by jar, posted 02-09-2005 11:52 PM jar has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024