Why do unbelievers hate christians most?

Generally because you ignore the content of people's posts and simply repeat yourself. Take the above example of Trae's post. As always, Mike... I don't have a beef with you. But this is a discussion forum. Discussing what people say tends to be the standard of behavior.This message has been edited by Dan Carroll, 08-10-2004 05:21 PM

---

"Archeologists near mount Sinai have discovered what is believed to be a missing page from the Bible. The page is currently being carbon dated in Bonn. If genuine, it belongs at the beginning of the Bible and is believed to read, 'To my darling Candy. All characters portrayed within this book are fictitous, and any resemblance to persons living or dead is purely coincidental.' The page has been universally condemned by church leaders."
-Rob Grant and Doug Naylor

I do assimilate the posts though. I read what Trae said, but if it sounds like some self-righteouss hogwash not relevant to my person, (as in message 1) - then what should I say? I have enough responders to deal with without heeding the rants and ramblings of disgruntled people.Listen Dan - everybody is guilty of sticking to their possition, I get the feeling your unhappy because I might have not responded to your posts in the past. I do read them though.

Then don't heed them. Assigning statements to them that aren't there (such as "you're saying I'm a witch hunting crusader") is a whole different ball of wax. Feel what you like. You wanted an explanation, you got it. Whether you heed it is up to you.

---

"Archeologists near mount Sinai have discovered what is believed to be a missing page from the Bible. The page is currently being carbon dated in Bonn. If genuine, it belongs at the beginning of the Bible and is believed to read, 'To my darling Candy. All characters portrayed within this book are fictitous, and any resemblance to persons living or dead is purely coincidental.' The page has been universally condemned by church leaders."
-Rob Grant and Doug Naylor

I didn't say that. Here's what I said;"I guess defending Dan's mom wasn't enough to "convince" Trae that I'm not some witch burning crusader.""Guess" being the operative word.But what strikes me as odd is why you'd give a hoot about what I say to some random evcer popping into cyberspace for a flash in the dark of my eternal battle. Thus - you side with "the other person" - explain!

Pull your pants down.

Has Mike become one of us fags?

---

The Laminator
For goodness's sake, please vote Democrat this November!

I still don't know why you're scared.

You should really have a tissue handy when you do that. It was a good, recent example of something you do regularly. I have this funny thing about siding with the person who's not talking crap. I know, it's a quirk.This message has been edited by Dan Carroll, 08-11-2004 09:30 AM

---

"Archeologists near mount Sinai have discovered what is believed to be a missing page from the Bible. The page is currently being carbon dated in Bonn. If genuine, it belongs at the beginning of the Bible and is believed to read, 'To my darling Candy. All characters portrayed within this book are fictitous, and any resemblance to persons living or dead is purely coincidental.' The page has been universally condemned by church leaders."
-Rob Grant and Doug Naylor

An admin is watching me like a hawk, ready to suspend me at anytime. By telling you this, I am running the risk of becoming a suspended.

---

The Laminator
For goodness's sake, please vote Democrat this November!

Just state what I have said that you think is "crap" and we can talk about it. Do you mean "baby curry" - or is there a more plausible explanation. That being that you are against me.Well atleast I'm on topic.Lam - I don't smoke. This message has been edited by mike the wiz, 08-11-2004 12:37 PM

You've had an example pointed out to you. You dodged with wanky semantics.

---

"Archeologists near mount Sinai have discovered what is believed to be a missing page from the Bible. The page is currently being carbon dated in Bonn. If genuine, it belongs at the beginning of the Bible and is believed to read, 'To my darling Candy. All characters portrayed within this book are fictitous, and any resemblance to persons living or dead is purely coincidental.' The page has been universally condemned by church leaders."
-Rob Grant and Doug Naylor

Who's whining now?

No interest in whining here, Mike. Just don't like repeating myself.You asked a question that was already answered. You want to address that answer, feel free.

---

"Archeologists near mount Sinai have discovered what is believed to be a missing page from the Bible. The page is currently being carbon dated in Bonn. If genuine, it belongs at the beginning of the Bible and is believed to read, 'To my darling Candy. All characters portrayed within this book are fictitous, and any resemblance to persons living or dead is purely coincidental.' The page has been universally condemned by church leaders."
-Rob Grant and Doug Naylor

But I have shown that I was guessing, with the word "guess".What is there to address but your disgruntlement?Talking cr*p and wan*y semantics is what you've said about me. Why should I address anything you say Dan? You seem to argue with me for arguments sake. I suggest you hate me and christians. I suggest your signatures are always anti-bible. I suggest you want to "refute" me for refuting's sake. I suggest you heed these truths!

Which is exactly where the wanky semantics come in.If all you want here is to jerk off wildly in public, let me know. I'll put on a raincoat and leave you to it.But just for the sake of fun... what exactly about Trae's post prompted you to "guess" that he felt you were a witch burning crusader? Uh... Mike, you brought all this up, remember? Back in post #1. You specifically brought me into it by name. You know, if you don't want argument, you should probably get a website instead of posting on a forum. On your own website, you could say whatever you want without worrying about people responding. Once again Mike, I really don't know you. I couldn't say whether I hate you or like you. And I'm pretty disgusted by the mass actions of Christians down the years, but wouldn't say I hate all Christians.We went over all this several posts back. And hey, look... Mike's ignoring it and repeating himself anyway. They are. I think that the Bible, read as non-fiction, is ridiculous. My signatures illustrate this.What's your point?This message has been edited by Dan Carroll, 08-11-2004 02:56 PM

---

"Archeologists near mount Sinai have discovered what is believed to be a missing page from the Bible. The page is currently being carbon dated in Bonn. If genuine, it belongs at the beginning of the Bible and is believed to read, 'To my darling Candy. All characters portrayed within this book are fictitous, and any resemblance to persons living or dead is purely coincidental.' The page has been universally condemned by church leaders."
-Rob Grant and Doug Naylor