Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,929 Year: 4,186/9,624 Month: 1,057/974 Week: 16/368 Day: 16/11 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Lying For Jesus Award
ringo
Member (Idle past 443 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 36 of 279 (379515)
01-24-2007 1:24 PM
Reply to: Message 35 by Phat
01-24-2007 1:06 PM


Re: Who represents who?
Phat writes:
Does it not say somewhere that you are blessed when attacked?
quote:
Luk 6:22 Blessed are ye, when men shall hate you, and when they shall separate you from their company, and shall reproach you, and cast out your name as evil, for the Son of man's sake.
But on the other hand:
quote:
Joh 7:7 The world cannot hate you; but me it hateth, because I testify of it, that the works thereof are evil.
And:
quote:
1Jo 3:13 Marvel not, my brethren, if the world hate you.
1Jo 3:14 We know that we have passed from death unto life, because we love the brethren. He that loveth not his brother abideth in death.
The world can see who "loveth not his brother" - who preaches at his brother instead of feeding him, who condemns his brother, who won't let his brother marry the person of his choice.
If the world hates you, that's not an excuse to puff yourself up as a martyr - it's an oppurtunity to change the world's perception of you.

Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 35 by Phat, posted 01-24-2007 1:06 PM Phat has not replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 443 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 51 of 279 (379805)
01-25-2007 2:19 PM
Reply to: Message 49 by Phat
01-25-2007 12:03 PM


Re: No True Christian Fallacy
Phat writes:
Do you have no qualms about generalizing?
One of my cousins is married to the son of a Nazi general.
Do I think less of her for that? Or him?
Is it "over-generalizing" to say that Nazis make Germany look bad?

Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 49 by Phat, posted 01-25-2007 12:03 PM Phat has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 58 by anastasia, posted 01-25-2007 11:22 PM ringo has not replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 443 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 90 of 279 (380947)
01-29-2007 1:20 PM
Reply to: Message 89 by New Cat's Eye
01-29-2007 12:34 PM


Re: Who represents who?
Catholic Scientist writes:
Lack of opposition is not support and lack of support is not opposition.
quote:
When the Nazis came for the communists,
I remained silent;
I was not a communist.
When they locked up the social democrats,
I did not speak out;
I was not a social democrat.
When they came for the trade unionists,
I did not speak out;
I was not a trade unionist.
When they came for me,
there was no one left to speak out.
-- Martin Niemller
quote:
All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.
-- attributed to Edmund Burke

Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 89 by New Cat's Eye, posted 01-29-2007 12:34 PM New Cat's Eye has not replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 443 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 109 of 279 (381081)
01-29-2007 6:35 PM
Reply to: Message 103 by riVeRraT
01-29-2007 5:17 PM


Re: Who represents who?
Schrafinator said:
quote:
what is preventing them from loudly and publicly denouning him?
And you responded:
riVeRraT writes:
He who is without sin shold throw the first stone.
When Jesus said that, He was talking about actually stoning somebody.
(Why is it that you can't see when something is literal? )
He was not saying we have to be without sin to speak out against wrong-doing, He was just saying "Don't kill the wrongdoers."
He also said:
quote:
Luk 17:3 Take heed to yourselves: If thy brother trespass against thee, rebuke him; and if he repent, forgive him.
It is clear that the Christian thing to do is to rebuke your Christian brothers when they do wrong, not turn away and ignore it.
And don't forgive them until they repent.

Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 103 by riVeRraT, posted 01-29-2007 5:17 PM riVeRraT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 110 by anastasia, posted 01-29-2007 7:08 PM ringo has replied
 Message 124 by riVeRraT, posted 01-30-2007 9:54 AM ringo has replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 443 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 111 of 279 (381094)
01-29-2007 7:16 PM
Reply to: Message 110 by anastasia
01-29-2007 7:08 PM


Re: Who represents who?
anastasia writes:
Trinity Baptist Church - A nice example of 'christians' speaking out in opposition of Falwell.
Are you sure that isn't Landover Baptist?

Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 110 by anastasia, posted 01-29-2007 7:08 PM anastasia has not replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 443 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 126 of 279 (381248)
01-30-2007 11:37 AM
Reply to: Message 124 by riVeRraT
01-30-2007 9:54 AM


Re: Who represents who?
riVeRraT writes:
Picking and choosing what is literal now, are we?
Well, of course. An intelligent reading of any text involves deciding what is literal and what is not.
I never said it was wrong to rebuke them, I do it all the time.
Then you agree that Christians should speak out against Falwell, Robertson and all the other Gangsters for Christ. Good. Let's see you do more of that around here.
I usually forgive people instantly, but I may not trust them until the repent.
Allow me to repeat:
quote:
Luk 17:3 Take heed to yourselves: If thy brother trespass against thee, rebuke him; and if he repent, forgive him.
Did you notice the "if" this time?
You're not supposed to "forgive" Benny Hinn for conning little old ladies and then watch him keep doing it.

Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 124 by riVeRraT, posted 01-30-2007 9:54 AM riVeRraT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 138 by riVeRraT, posted 01-31-2007 9:10 AM ringo has replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 443 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 132 of 279 (381369)
01-30-2007 6:59 PM
Reply to: Message 131 by anastasia
01-30-2007 6:54 PM


anastasia writes:
Do you think we believe speaking out against men solves spiritual problems?
What part of "If thy brother trespass against thee, rebuke him" do you not understand?

Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 131 by anastasia, posted 01-30-2007 6:54 PM anastasia has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 133 by anastasia, posted 01-30-2007 7:34 PM ringo has replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 443 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 134 of 279 (381384)
01-30-2007 7:46 PM
Reply to: Message 133 by anastasia
01-30-2007 7:34 PM


anastasia writes:
Oh, sorry, have you got Falwell's phone number. Let the rebuking begin!
Falwell trespasses publicly, so the rebuke should be public too, not private by phone. You can start by rebuking him here and by rebuking what he stands for instead of defending Christians who turn a blind eye.

Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 133 by anastasia, posted 01-30-2007 7:34 PM anastasia has not replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 443 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 140 of 279 (381500)
01-31-2007 11:03 AM
Reply to: Message 138 by riVeRraT
01-31-2007 9:10 AM


Re: Who represents who?
riVeRraT writes:
Then you agree that Christians should speak out against Falwell, Robertson and all the other Gangsters for Christ. Good.
It is totally amazing to me that you would think otherwise.
Makes me wonder.
You neglected to quote the most important part. I also said:
quote:
Let's see you do more of that around here.
Don't be amazed. Don't wonder. Don't be so defensive. Stand up and speak out for what you believe in, here where you have a voice.
Instead of arguing against me, speak out against those guys. Then there won't be any more confusion about whether or not you condone what they do.

Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 138 by riVeRraT, posted 01-31-2007 9:10 AM riVeRraT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 142 by riVeRraT, posted 02-01-2007 1:41 PM ringo has replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 443 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 146 of 279 (381658)
02-01-2007 2:25 PM
Reply to: Message 142 by riVeRraT
02-01-2007 1:41 PM


Re: Who represents who?
riVeRraT writes:
Tell me, should I also be speaking out against other religions as well?
quote:
Mat 7:3 And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother's eye, but considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye?
Extend that to groups as well as to individuals. "Why beholdest thou the mote that is in the Muslim's eye or the Hindu's eye, but considerest not the beam in the Christian's eye?"

Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 142 by riVeRraT, posted 02-01-2007 1:41 PM riVeRraT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 180 by riVeRraT, posted 02-02-2007 9:46 AM ringo has replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 443 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 155 of 279 (381737)
02-01-2007 9:06 PM
Reply to: Message 153 by anastasia
02-01-2007 8:27 PM


Re: Falwell Lies For Jesus?
anastasia writes:
Lying requires a conscious effort to decieve.
You can water down the definition of a "lie" until almost nothing is a lie.
If you remember, the commandment is not against "a conscious effort to decieve", it's against "false witness". We are commanded not to spread falsehoods. It is our responsibility to determine to the best of our ability that something is true before we proclaim it.
Anybody who claims to believe in a young earth, for example, has not done that. The information is readily available to prove that claim false. Anybody who wilfully ignores it is bearing false witness.
"Belief" is no excuse.

Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 153 by anastasia, posted 02-01-2007 8:27 PM anastasia has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 156 by anastasia, posted 02-01-2007 9:31 PM ringo has replied
 Message 158 by anastasia, posted 02-01-2007 9:42 PM ringo has replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 443 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 159 of 279 (381771)
02-01-2007 9:47 PM
Reply to: Message 156 by anastasia
02-01-2007 9:31 PM


Re: Falwell Lies For Jesus?
anastasia writes:
Likewise, there is the belief that anyone who willfully ignores the evidence of the Bible is bearing false witness.
Not the same thing at all. When the Bible talks about "false witness" it is talking about real-world events. The "rules of evidence" are very similar to those in science - e.g. Leviticus required two witnesses (verification).
The only way to truly combat this is to exhort people not to regard scientific evidence as falsifying the Bible, but as proving our own fallibility in understanding the Bible, and the hopelessness of attaching literal meaning to the words.
Exactly. That means we have to speak out against interpretations of the Bible that are false - e.g. a young earth.

Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 156 by anastasia, posted 02-01-2007 9:31 PM anastasia has not replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 443 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 161 of 279 (381776)
02-01-2007 9:55 PM
Reply to: Message 158 by anastasia
02-01-2007 9:42 PM


Re: Falwell Lies For Jesus?
anastasia writes:
You can water down the definition of a "lie" until almost nothing is a lie.
Or, you can understand the difference between a lie and being wrong about something.
No. That's not what false witness means.
As I said, "believing" a lie is not an excuse for spreading it. Do your homework. If it has been falsified, shut the @#$% up. If you're not sure, shut the @#$% up. If you are sure and you repeat it and somebody calls you on it, shut the @#$% up.
Whoever fails all three of those tests is wilfully bearing false witness.

Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 158 by anastasia, posted 02-01-2007 9:42 PM anastasia has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 164 by anastasia, posted 02-01-2007 9:19 PM ringo has replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 443 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 166 of 279 (381773)
02-01-2007 9:53 PM
Reply to: Message 164 by anastasia
02-01-2007 9:19 PM


Re: Falwell Lies For Jesus?
anastasia writes:
So, if my sister calls 15 people and plans a party for my baby. whom she believes is about to celebrate a birthday, she has no excuse for her 'lie'?
Of course not.
I am talking about people who believe.
But the topic is not about just "beliefs". It's about things that can be verified.
... if my sister hears from another sister that she is wrong, she may still 'believe' she is right.
But she still hasn't done her homework. She could call you, the baby's mother, to verify the facts.
In the end, party happens, based on a lie, but it does no harm for anyone involved.
So, no harm no lie. Is that your story?
Why can't you just be happy with knowing the truth?
quote:
Mar 16:15 And he said unto them, Go ye into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature.
Part of spreading the "good news" is exposing the bad news spread by false witnesses. Blythely ignoring your responsibility is not an option.

Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 164 by anastasia, posted 02-01-2007 9:19 PM anastasia has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 167 by anastasia, posted 02-01-2007 10:04 PM ringo has replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 443 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 168 of 279 (381789)
02-01-2007 10:17 PM
Reply to: Message 167 by anastasia
02-01-2007 10:04 PM


Re: Falwell Lies For Jesus?
anastasia writes:
In every thread you seem bent on playing 'The Bible Says', except, um, in the morality threads.
On the contrary, I play "The Bible Says" in every thread.
(It's amazing how little Bible understanding the Bible thumpers have. Too much thumping and not enough reading, I guess.)
And this is a morality thread. The point is that you should be helping your fellow Christians to be scrupulously clean, not just painting over the dirt.

Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 167 by anastasia, posted 02-01-2007 10:04 PM anastasia has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 169 by anastasia, posted 02-01-2007 10:31 PM ringo has replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024