How bad is your googling habit and what does it mean?

What do you mean by Google being 'just' a better librarian? Better than who or what?As a community college librarian, I find that most people, students, community members, and even some faculty, need to be trained on how to search beyond the very basics, how to narrow a search down to eliminate clutter and spurious results, even how to judge whether a given site is a reasonably valid source of information.When doing serious research, Google (or any other search engine) is at best just a start. It is the databases that contain the detailed and reliable information from peer reviewed journals, a relative rarity on the free portion of the internet. That, and actual books that are indexed and referenced.The WWW, of which Google is but one search method, is great for buying and selling, obtaining basic information, and even for spell-checking (hint, hint some members) but the way in which such massive amounts of data are sifted, interpreted, and evaluated as to validity is only as good as the critical thinking skills and, in many cases, subject knowledge of the searcher.But hey, you don't have to take my word for it, just type in something innocuous like the search term 'geologic column' and see how much worthless crap there is on the web.

---

Read not to contradict and confute, not to believe and take for granted, not to find talk and discourse, but to weigh and consider - Francis BaconThe more we understand particular things, the more we understand God - Spinoza

Yes, the WWW does provide convenience, for both of us. Does it then follow that it contains all human knowledge, or even as much knowledge as all libraries put together?The primary problem with the way some approach the WWW is that they see all sites as equally valid as there is no peer review, no vetting as to whether they are true or false. People are not born with an innate knowledge of information literacy or critical thinking skills, these have to be taught. Your inquiry confuses a tool with a profession, indeed even a given person. To me, Google is one tool out of many, that searches the WWW, one source out of many.So when you use the term 'better' that may be true in terms of immediate convenience but is false in terms of comprehensiveness or often even validity. My employers pay me for serving the information needs of my clientle, they could care less what you think as you speak for neither group. Up to your old bad habits, I see. Show us where I said any such thing.

---

Read not to contradict and confute, not to believe and take for granted, not to find talk and discourse, but to weigh and consider - Francis BaconThe more we understand particular things, the more we understand God - Spinoza