Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 368/286 Day: 11/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   A young sun - a response
Eta_Carinae
Member (Idle past 4405 days)
Posts: 547
From: US
Joined: 11-15-2003


Message 301 of 308 (74067)
12-18-2003 10:04 AM
Reply to: Message 299 by Buzsaw
12-18-2003 9:52 AM


Re:
To repeat - there is no way of knowing the collapse time based upon observation of the Sun itself.
That information is lost in the collapse process. No present day observation of the Sun can give you that information.
What part of this can you not fathom.
No observation of any quantity maintains information of that time. The star in the collapse passes through a fully convective phase. As such it is homogeneous and rotates as a solid body. Thus no differentiation of the internal structure occurs so no light elemental abundances we can measure now allow us to probe this time period during the stars formation. Since it rotates as a solid body (due to convection) we cannot extrapolate backwards in time. We don't know the initial Sun's total angular momentum.
Thus when referring to a star's age the zero point is usually taken as the time it arrives on the main sequence (or first forms a radiative core - these are close to the same time.)
Now from that point on we can set a clock so to speak.
But the collapse itself HAS NO EFFECT on the subsequent evolution.
The estimates for a collapse time are based upon basic physics plus observations of young stellar objects (in various stages) in star forming regions. You can then estimate the collapse time.
BUT TO REPEAT, the collapse time is not something we can gather from observations of the Sun taken at the present day.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 299 by Buzsaw, posted 12-18-2003 9:52 AM Buzsaw has not replied

Eta_Carinae
Member (Idle past 4405 days)
Posts: 547
From: US
Joined: 11-15-2003


Message 302 of 308 (74069)
12-18-2003 10:07 AM
Reply to: Message 298 by Buzsaw
12-18-2003 9:36 AM


Re: Sun Age again
Eta's bogus idea that it's protostar stage doesn't count in calculating age is BOGUS BUNK TO DENY THE SCIENTIFIC FACTS SO AS NOT TO ADMIT BUZ IS RIGHT.
Will you please tell me why this is BOGUS.
It is not bogus, it is unfortunately a physical fact.
Tell me the scientific facts that allow us to measure the collapse time based upon solar observation.
We shall write the journal paper together. You can be the first creationist with an ApJ paper and I can further my career or destroy it with creationist collaboration.
[This message has been edited by Eta_Carinae, 12-18-2003]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 298 by Buzsaw, posted 12-18-2003 9:36 AM Buzsaw has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 304 by Coragyps, posted 12-18-2003 10:12 AM Eta_Carinae has not replied
 Message 305 by Buzsaw, posted 12-18-2003 10:21 AM Eta_Carinae has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024