Summations Only

Have you seen a rain drop form? Have you seen a magic sky wizard design a universe?Edited by hooah212002, : No reason given.

So you just glom words together, hoping to get some point across? What does this phrase even mean? What is techy? So you would have no problem providing, say...., a video of this? On the other hand, you, ICANT, none of us human-kind have ever seen anything having no evidence of a before, outside of, timeless, space-less, etc. event such as the magical myth of the alleged IDer or sky wizard which has been indoctrinated into the impressionable minds of the sheeple church going children of our societies, even attempting to shoehorn this wizardry into the schools.

You have no clue what you are talking about and if you can't get a better understanding after cavediver has schooled you numerous times, I doubt I can. Nay, I know I cannot put it any simpler than either Son Goku or cavediver.... let alone the others who know far more than myself. I do know this: you have know clue what the big bang is or what the theory entails so I refuse to chase any fantasies you have about it in order to attempt to refute it. You will notice I said your magic sky wizard, not jews. Your jews doing whatever jews do has fuck all to do with observing your engineer/designer/jew wizard/majik sky daddy thingamabob.Edited by hooah212002, : Grammatical fuck fest

Buz, old bean, you have proven your ability to copy and paste text from online dictionaries. However, what you have failed to do (quite miserably, I might add) is display a working knowledge of the words with which you copy/paste said definitions of. It is easy to "know" a word and have no actual clue as to how to accurately, or even effectively, use it in proper discussion. It would be seen as almost heroic if you admitted that you don't actually understand these words and asked for help in getting a working definition. It has become tiresome reading your posts in which you slop a bunch of smart sounding words together that make the sentence they appear in altogether unintelligible.I say all that to say this: it is increasingly apparent that you've not the foggiest idea what entropy means in the sense you are attempting to use it and the sense the rest of us recognize as being pertinent to this discussion.

This goes two ways, as I see it:1: if threads like this start (regardless of who the OP is) and no one stands in opposition, people like Buz claim victory and onlookers will see it as no one being able to refute him.or2: He gets copious amounts of responses (as creationists tend to garner) because we on the science side of things have a tendency to have the correct information out there and the OP (buz, in this case and now apparently you) will see these amount of responses as a victory.I suppose there is a third reason that straggler touched on: this is a debate site and Buz is bullheaded so he continues on with topics even after he is shown to be oh-so-wrong, thus giving members something fun to do. Target practice, if you will.For a religion that claims it's followers should be humble or meek, you lot are extremely arrogant.

I predict that this thread will go down in the annals of EvC history being one that gets used by Buz as an example of how he bested EvC's brightest, especially cavediver, and how not one of our many evo secularists could refute his "hypothesis", thus claiming victory. This has also been foretold by prophet Chuck77, who is also seemingly claiming victory on Buz's behalf.But what this thread really showed us is how creationists so frequently attempt to call upon science to show they are correct, but abhor science when it shows them to be not only wrong, but oh so utterly and incomprehensibly wrong. We have also witnessed how arrogance gets in the way of proper science, since one can never conduct proper science if one can never admit being wrong or have a willingness to learn.