How would a genetic bottleneck be effected, given no pre-flood genetic data was known.
I have to ask: do you even know what is meant by bottleneck? IF the flood account were factual, for EVERY LIVING ORGANISM ON EARTH, the genetics would trace back to TWO parent individuals 4350 years ago (or whatever time frame you wish to ascribe said flood to). However, that simply isn't the case, as others have repeatedly shown you. Pre-flood super-climate (whatever the hell that is) has NOTHING to do with it. The genetics of anyone pre-flood is unnecessary.
Let me explain it in terms you may understand: take your family tree. Suppose (for arguments sake only) that Noah was YOUR great grandfather. Your lineage would lead to Noah, correct? Any DNA samples would lead to Noah. All of your genetics would lead to Noah. Your children's would lead to Noah. YOUR great-grand-children would lead to Noah. THEIR great-grandchildren would lead to Noah. Such SHOULD be the case for EVERY LIVING ORGANISM ON THE PLANET had your flood happened. This is NOT the case. The lineage for EVERY LIVING ORGANISM ON EARTH should lead to two parent individuals 4350 years ago. This just is NOT the case, now is it?
Does that make it easier to understand?
Edited by hooah212002, : No reason given.
"A still more glorious dawn awaits
Not a sunrise, but a galaxy rise
A morning filled with 400 billion suns
The rising of the milky way"
-Carl Sagan