Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,488 Year: 3,745/9,624 Month: 616/974 Week: 229/276 Day: 5/64 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Potential Evidence for a Global Flood
Adminnemooseus
Administrator
Posts: 3974
Joined: 09-26-2002


Message 76 of 320 (574078)
08-13-2010 10:17 PM
Reply to: Message 75 by Buzsaw
08-13-2010 9:54 PM


Little or no evidence there
Buz, there isn't much at all for flood evidence (potential or otherwise) in your message.
Ron Wyatt, who laid claim to discovering the ark site in Turkey also discovered in the region some thirteen or so large stones with holes, (one in the end of each elongated stone) in them which he described as ballast stones to keep the ark boyant and stable. Some of those stones, according to Wyatt, have ancient inscriptions in the relating to eight people and a boat etc. These were believed to have been inscribed by local dwellers of the region, subsequent to the flood.
Ark evidence would contribute to support for the flood having happened, but we should see much more evidence than just that. Anyway, any evidence of the ark you do have would be worthy of a new topic. Why don't you start one. And include something to back up those Wyatt claims.
Adminnemooseus

This message is a reply to:
 Message 75 by Buzsaw, posted 08-13-2010 9:54 PM Buzsaw has not replied

Adminnemooseus
Administrator
Posts: 3974
Joined: 09-26-2002


Message 81 of 320 (574086)
08-13-2010 11:35 PM


For whatever it might be worth, a replay of message 1
Jzyehoshua , in message 1, writes:
I would like to see a topic created discussing the possible evidence for a global flood. This was starting to get discussed here when another member suggested it would be better put in a separate topic.
I'd like to discuss ancient flood legends worldwide, the process of fossilization as possible support for a global catastrophe, and recent scientific discoveries showing that mass extinctions of marine life occurred at a global level and that there is indeed more water in the earth's core than has been historically believed.
Other subjects might include the mixing of fossil deposits by strata, deposition rates and natural mummification, and evidence of instantaneous fossilization (such as large numbers of fish preserved with flesh outlines or starfish that died hovering over clams en masse).
It might also delve into the question of whether there is evidence for microevolution as opposed to macroevolution, and thus whether there is support for fewer animals on the ark. After all, if the 'parent species' Darwin pondered as an alternative to all species having a common ancestor (On the Origin of Species, Ch. 1, pg. 17), were to exist in fact, then it would not only explain why there are such problems with finding an orderly progression of transitional forms (another problem queried by Darwin in the book), but provide basis for needing fewer animals on the ark, providing additional plausibility to the theory. It might also focus on Pangaea and whether a global flood would provide insight into the breaking up of the supercontinent and subsequent continental drift.
Adminnemooseus

Replies to this message:
 Message 82 by Bikerman, posted 08-14-2010 12:23 AM Adminnemooseus has seen this message but not replied
 Message 84 by Bikerman, posted 08-14-2010 1:44 AM Adminnemooseus has seen this message but not replied

Adminnemooseus
Administrator
Posts: 3974
Joined: 09-26-2002


(1)
Message 169 of 320 (631581)
09-01-2011 8:26 PM
Reply to: Message 168 by Admin
09-01-2011 7:45 PM


Jar and Coyote restricted out of the "Geology and the Great Flood" forum
For their outstanding contributions to the fiasco.
Especially Jar.
Maybe suspension should have been done.
Adminnemooseus

This message is a reply to:
 Message 168 by Admin, posted 09-01-2011 7:45 PM Admin has seen this message but not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 170 by jar, posted 09-01-2011 8:28 PM Adminnemooseus has seen this message but not replied

Adminnemooseus
Administrator
Posts: 3974
Joined: 09-26-2002


Message 222 of 320 (633007)
09-11-2011 11:46 PM
Reply to: Message 221 by Just being real
09-11-2011 10:54 PM


People, be nice now
This certainly is an odd message. There, I've said it, others need not.
Please be nice in your replies - Snark doe not promote quality discussion/debate.
Adminnemooseus

Please be familiar with the various topics and other links in the "Essential Links", found in the top of the page menu. Amongst other things, this is where to find where to report various forum problems.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 221 by Just being real, posted 09-11-2011 10:54 PM Just being real has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 223 by Just being real, posted 09-11-2011 11:55 PM Adminnemooseus has seen this message but not replied
 Message 264 by Just being real, posted 09-17-2011 4:36 AM Adminnemooseus has seen this message but not replied

Adminnemooseus
Administrator
Posts: 3974
Joined: 09-26-2002


Message 258 of 320 (633609)
09-15-2011 1:39 AM


[Um]
Temporary topic closure because of bogus messages coming in about 15 minutes. Trying to get in more bogasity before closure might trigger moose crankiness.
Reopen in maybe about 18 hours.
[/Um]
Adminnemooseus
Added by edit: Topic was closed because of existing bogus messages, not that bogus messages were incoming (Well, it was to stop more bogus messages). The above should have be stated as "Temporary topic closure, because of bogus messages, coming in about 15 minutes." Although "Because of bogus messages, temporary topic closure coming in about 15 minutes" probably would have been even better.
See here for further clarification and perhaps a chuckle.
Edited by Adminnemooseus, : See above.

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024