Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
8 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,816 Year: 3,073/9,624 Month: 918/1,588 Week: 101/223 Day: 12/17 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Potential Evidence for a Global Flood
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 42 of 320 (565378)
06-16-2010 12:55 PM
Reply to: Message 40 by Jumped Up Chimpanzee
06-16-2010 11:08 AM


Re: Back to the basics
As a member of the non-Creationist laity, I hope that it is of value for the likes of myself to contribute to some of these dicussions, to show that even if you don't have an in-depth knowledge of science and specific data, you can still understand the principles and logic that make the scientific case so strong and reliable.
Yes and no... Generally, sure, you don't need a lot of in-depth knowledge.
But this guy was talking about atmosphereic levels and decay rate changes of carbon 14. It going to take some in-depth knowledge to get it with that one, its not something your just gonna hash out for yourself with reason and common sense.
I'd be interested to know if scientists on this site appreciate contributions from the likes of myself on these topics, arguing mainly out of reason and common sense (I hope)...
Yes! The more the merrier!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 40 by Jumped Up Chimpanzee, posted 06-16-2010 11:08 AM Jumped Up Chimpanzee has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024