|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Christmas Star Explained | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Taz Member (Idle past 3322 days) Posts: 5069 From: Zerus Joined: |
Ringo writes:
Even I can answer this one. Why was Herod (and all Jerusalem with him) "troubled" when the wise men asked about the star? If they had already seen it, why weren't they already troubled? What changed when the wise men came? They all saw the star, but none of them thought of the implication. The wise men specifically asked Herod where the new king of Israel was. This lit up a light in Herod's head. The better question in this is if they were wise men, why the hell did they ask the regional king where the new king was? Seriously, we are talking about a time when brothers killed brothers to be kings. Why on Earth would the "wise men" tell the king that a new king had just been born? Disclaimer: Occasionally, owing to the deficiency of the English language, I have used he/him/his meaning he or she/him or her/his or her in order to avoid awkwardness of style. He, him, and his are not intended as exclusively masculine pronouns. They may refer to either sex or to both sexes!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 443 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
Taz writes: They all saw the star, but none of them thought of the implication. But why would "all Jerusalem" be troubled? Herod had a throne to lose but surely some of the ordinary peons would be glad to see him go, not troubled.
Why on Earth would the "wise men" tell the king that a new king had just been born? They assumed that he had wise men of his own who would have told him about the sign. But if Herod already knew about it, why did he ask the wise men when it appeared?
quote: Edited by Ringo, : "And" --> "But". “Faith moves mountains, but only knowledge moves them to the right place” -- Joseph Goebbels ------------- Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation. Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Taz Member (Idle past 3322 days) Posts: 5069 From: Zerus Joined: |
Ringo writes:
I think we should take "all" as a metaphore for a lot of people here. Ringo, people are generally weary of political change, especially during times of absolute authoritarian. You never know what will happen when a new king come to power.
But why would "all Jerusalem" be troubled? Herod had a throne to lose but surely some of the ordinary peons would be glad to see him go, not troubled.
Well, a peasant's life was simple. Get in the morning to work. Eat. Sleep with your wife. Breed. Ok, may be I'm not doing them enough justice, but I want to point out that their lives were probably stable enough that they didn't want to risk a change in government.
They assumed that he had wise men of his own who would have told him about the sign.
Well, yeah, and we'd assume that Hitler had wise men with him that could have told him that the Normandy Beach landing was the real deal and not a diversion. You can't use coulda/woulda/shoulda to evaluate history... myth. By your logic, I could point out that little red riding hood should have recognized the big bad wolf right away instead of asking about the eyes, teeth, ears, etc.
But if Herod already knew about it, why did he ask the wise men when it appeared?
Because nobody paid attention? I don't know. Disclaimer: Occasionally, owing to the deficiency of the English language, I have used he/him/his meaning he or she/him or her/his or her in order to avoid awkwardness of style. He, him, and his are not intended as exclusively masculine pronouns. They may refer to either sex or to both sexes!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 443 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
Taz writes: I think we should take "all" as a metaphore for a lot of people here. You can take the "star" as a metaphor for Kris Kristofferson while you're at it. I'm just taking what the text says, and there's simply no indication that anybody saw the "star" except the wise men. (Before or after, for that matter.)
By your logic, I could point out that little red riding hood should have recognized the big bad wolf right away instead of asking about the eyes, teeth, ears, etc. You're missing my logic. My logic is that the wise men were open with Herod because they assumed He already knew about Jesus' birth. While we're at it, why would they assume that the new king was a usurper and not Herod's own son?
quote: Because nobody paid attention? I don't know. Everybody saw the "star", but nobody paid any attention until some guys from the East mentioned it? Then they got troubled? Just read the story, SimpleTaz. “Faith moves mountains, but only knowledge moves them to the right place” -- Joseph Goebbels ------------- Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation. Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Taz Member (Idle past 3322 days) Posts: 5069 From: Zerus Joined: |
Ringo writes:
I have, many times.
Just read the story, SimpleTaz. Everybody saw the "star", but nobody paid any attention until some guys from the East mentioned it? Then they got troubled?
Again, I don't know. It's a fable. We could sit here all night nitpicking the hell out of this myth or we could recognize it for what it is.
My logic is that the wise men were open with Herod because they assumed He already knew about Jesus' birth. While we're at it, why would they assume that the new king was a usurper and not Herod's own son?
For one thing, I can guess that they didn't think the new king was Herod's own son for one very good reason: They asked Herod where the new king was instead of asking to see him. Let's look at it this way. Suppose that the news has just reached your ears that my wife had just given birth to a new born baby and the baby was healthy. It took you a month to get here to congratulate me. You finally got to my house. You see me sitting there with my wife. You then proceed to ask me "could you give me driving directions so I could go visit your new born baby?" What a stupid question! The baby is upstairs sleeping, you dumbass.
You're missing my logic.
I suppose I am.
You can take the "star" as a metaphor for Kris Kristofferson while you're at it. I'm just taking what the text says, and there's simply no indication that anybody saw the "star" except the wise men. (Before or after, for that matter.)
Again, nitpick the myth all you want. But for a moment, consider this. What if the author of the myth exaggerated the brightness of the star? What if it was just a new star in heaven? Not everybody in the ancient world paid attention to the heavens. The few that did, like the wise men, followed it. Disclaimer: Occasionally, owing to the deficiency of the English language, I have used he/him/his meaning he or she/him or her/his or her in order to avoid awkwardness of style. He, him, and his are not intended as exclusively masculine pronouns. They may refer to either sex or to both sexes!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 443 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
Taz writes: It's a fable. We could sit here all night nitpicking the hell out of this myth or we could recognize it for what it is. A fable doesn't need embellishment any more than the truth does.
You finally got to my house. You see me sitting there with my wife. You then proceed to ask me "could you give me driving directions so I could go visit your new born baby?" You know damn well that's not what I'd ask. I'd ask, "Where's the baby?" - exactly like the wise men did. It was Herod who told them to go to Bethlehem. In your analogy, you'd be telling me, "He's at grandma's house."
What if the author of the myth exaggerated the brightness of the star? You're still missing it. There is no "brightness" in the story to exaggerate. When I asked you to read the story, I meant read what's in the story, not make up a bullshit story of your own. You need to read the Bible with Occam's Razor.
Not everybody in the ancient world paid attention to the heavens. So you agree that most of the people never saw any "star"? That's what I've been saying. “Faith moves mountains, but only knowledge moves them to the right place” -- Joseph Goebbels ------------- Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation. Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
simple  Inactive Member |
My guess is that they were concerned about a king being born. Not that they paid much attention to stars.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
simple  Inactive Member |
quote: And not really anything that indicates otherwise. That Herod may have been uninterested in spending time gazing at the cool night sky, rather than calling his female slaves, and eating feasts, or whatever he did, is not a big issue. The guy was insane. Who else would kill babies?? I will direct your attention the the shepherds. It doesn't mention the star here, and that could be because it was too low at that point to be considered a star. It almost sounds like it was almost on top of them! The folks inside singing up a storm, and angels about, etc. Oh, and the lights, of course! What is a close encounter without those lights shining down??Luke 2:9 And, lo, the angel of the Lord came upon them, and the glory of the Lord shone round about them: and they were sore afraid.. As we saw back in Ezekiel, that host seems to tag along the mobile throne, glorifying God. After all, what do you think the crowd of people were doing, floating on a CLOUD??
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rahvin Member Posts: 4046 Joined: Member Rating: 8.3 |
The guy was insane. Who else would kill babies?? Well, God, for one. Multiple times. The most obvious probably being the killing of the firstborn in Egypt. So, you agree that the Christian God is depicted as a psychopathic nutcase? I suppose if God were actually just an alien, it might make a bit more sense than an omnipotent benevolent deity. I mean, aliens supposedly mutilate cattle all the time, and seem to have a preoccupation with inserting objects in the human rectum. The Biblical God was certainly all about wanton slaughter while being obsessed with sex. Perhaps the 11th Commandment would have been "Thou shalt not have the buttsex, for that is reserved for the LORD your God and his anal probes alone," but he ran out of room on the tablet? Every time a fundy breaks the laws of thermodynamics, Schroedinger probably kills his cat.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 443 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
simple writes: I will direct your attention the the shepherds. It doesn't mention the star here, and that could be because it was too low at that point to be considered a star. Or, it could be because it wasn't there. “Faith moves mountains, but only knowledge moves them to the right place” -- Joseph Goebbels ------------- Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation. Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
simple  Inactive Member |
I can see you have a pet peeve against God, for not advocating for mankind, the stuff you seem to like.
For your info, alien abduction, so called, has nothing to do with God. Since it involves some of the things you mentioned, I would look to the US military, or some such. Blame it on the aliens, I suppose was as good a cover as anything, before Abu Ghraib? There was a time when the savage enemies of His people had to be dealt with in a tough way, before the new testament. Like the cruel slavers of Egypt. Go God go, ra ra rah. I see nothing wrong with sex, I do see something wrong with a sexless attitude, as if there was something wrong with it.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
simple  Inactive Member |
There was obviously something there, that profoundly influenced their lives. You can disbelieve it for no reason if you like. You can pretend that the host of heaven praising, were floating in thin air, if you like. You can ignore the great light that shone on them, and the appearance of angels. You can ignore the Christmas star, and anything else you like, but you can't use science to do it. And you can't use the bible to make a good case against the Starship Sceptre!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Taz Member (Idle past 3322 days) Posts: 5069 From: Zerus Joined: |
Ringo writes:
And I've been saying that you also need to read the story while considering the way people wrote down things in the ancient world. So you agree that most of the people never saw any "star"? That's what I've been saying. Helen was the most beautiful woman on Earth and everybody knew this. Paris was the most beautiful man on Earth and everybody knew this. Troy was the most blessed city on Earth and everyone knew this. Are we honestly going to point out that the regular Hittite peasant knew who the hell Helen or Paris was or what the City of Troy looked like? Or are we going to read it for what it was, a myth that probably was based partly on a real event and place with lots of exaggerations? All I'm saying is what if it was a very faint but newly appeared "star" and the wise men happenned to be the only ones that noticed it? Let's look at the story passage by passage.
quote:Again, did everybody know who the bitch Helen was or the dumbass Paris was? And yet, everybody supposedly knew that these were the two most beautiful people in the world. Why nitpick the "all Jerusalem with him" part? quote:Herod didn't ask the Magi to tell him where the star was because he couldn't see it. He asked them when it appeared. Let me ask you something. If tonight a new star appears in the sky would YOU notice it by yourself or would you only notice it after someone else (probably who observes the heavens everynight) pointed it out to you?
quote:Ok... so we know it's impossible for any star to be directly on any one particular location on Earth. Still, I see this as nothing more than an exaggeration, if not total fabrication. quote:What do you mean? Without embellishment, the Illiad would be just another war story... if that. If there was such an event as the virgin birth and if there was such an event as the wise men visiting the newborn Jesus, I'd imagine that it would be a really boring story if told accordingly. Disclaimer: Occasionally, owing to the deficiency of the English language, I have used he/him/his meaning he or she/him or her/his or her in order to avoid awkwardness of style. He, him, and his are not intended as exclusively masculine pronouns. They may refer to either sex or to both sexes!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
arachnophilia Member (Idle past 1374 days) Posts: 9069 From: god's waiting room Joined: |
We do know who the Father is, and the son, Shiloh that was born where and when. actually, you have not effectively demonstrated who or what "shiloh" means in this context. you quoted a few sources that said "obviously it's the messiah" and a few that pointed out the aramaic translators thought it meant "messiah." you then used that information to turn this into a messianic prophecy. it's not. it's a prophecy/birthright given to judah. "until shiloh comes" is an idiom for "until the end." the end has not happened yet -- this makes a lot more sense when you understand that the jewish concept of the messiah has more in common with the second coming of christ than the first. and in any case, the verse is about judah's royalty. not jesus. not a UFO. judah's royalty.
Some light was in the sky, as evidenced by many witnesses. There was a heavenly host here, as well as the time God passed by on His starship or wheels. no, as i keep pointing out, those groups of angels are different. you can't simply ignore that. you are trivializing the appearance of the heralding angels at christ's birth.
We would look to finding out what is is, not having the bible say 'starship'. That is silly. i agree, your point is silly. if they wanted to describe a spaceship -- couldn't they have given a description even remotely like ezekiel's?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 443 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
simple writes: You can disbelieve it for no reason if you like. You can pretend that the host of heaven praising, were floating in thin air, if you like. You can ignore the great light that shone on them, and the appearance of angels. You can ignore the Christmas star.... I'm not ignoring anything. I'm just saying that there's no indication in the Bible that the shepherds saw the star. “Faith moves mountains, but only knowledge moves them to the right place” -- Joseph Goebbels ------------- Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation. Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024