Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,929 Year: 4,186/9,624 Month: 1,057/974 Week: 16/368 Day: 16/11 Hour: 0/4


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   do Christians want their values enforced on everyone by law?
nator
Member (Idle past 2201 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 1 of 68 (361419)
11-04-2006 9:04 AM


In the Haggerd thread, a side thread started regarding the political leanings of Jesus. NJ wrote in Message 56:
quote:
Jesus isn't a Conservative and He isn't a Liberal.
I replied, in Message #64, by writing:
Jesus was a pretty radical Liberal in a lot of ways.
He was anti-business wealth and greed.
He was big into compassion and "he who is without sin can cast the first stone" is pretty famous.
He blessed the peacemakers, and admonished his followers to turn the other cheek to those who would do us evil.
He commanded, "love thy neighbor as thyself" and encouraged people to support the poor, even saying that his followers should sell everything they have and give it to the poor.
He encouraged people to "render unto Caesar what is Caesar's"
Faith then replied, writing in Message #65:
quote:
Jesus is different from a Liberal in that He never suggested that people should be FORCED by the government to do all those good things. Obedience to God is an individual thing.
To which I replied in Message #67:
But he believed in all of those Liberal principles as good and righteous things to do, which would earn great rewards in heaven. They should therefore really be called Christian, as well as Liberal principles, I suppose.
Maybe you should remember that the next time you start to slag off on Liberal values.
To which Faith replied in Messgae #70:
quote:
All those "liberal" values are for individuals, not for the state to enforce. That's all I'm saying. They are certainly Christian principles for believers to obey.
And finally, I responded, in Message #72:
OK, now I'm confused.
I thought that you WANTED the state to enforce christian principles?
There was no response.
------------------------------------
The question I have is regarding this seeming contradiction in what Faith is saying.
On the one hand, she agrees that all of those Liberal principles of compassion and not being judgemental, paying your taxes, being peacemakers and turning the other cheek, etc. are all good Christian values.
She then claims that Jesus shouldn't be thought of as a liberal because he didn't advocate those principles being imposed upon us through the government.
What I'd like to understand is why she, or any other Christian, would be opposed to these Christian principles being imposed by the government but completely support the governement imposing other Christian principles, such as banning gay marriage, banning embyonic stem cell research, stopping FDA approval of certain drugs because they have a religious objection to their uses even though those uses are legal, etc?
Social issues, please
Edited by schrafinator, : No reason given.

Replies to this message:
 Message 3 by subbie, posted 11-04-2006 12:05 PM nator has not replied
 Message 4 by Hyroglyphx, posted 11-04-2006 12:15 PM nator has replied
 Message 8 by mike the wiz, posted 11-04-2006 1:12 PM nator has replied
 Message 12 by Buzsaw, posted 11-04-2006 4:03 PM nator has replied
 Message 31 by iano, posted 11-04-2006 6:34 PM nator has replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2201 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 37 of 68 (361647)
11-04-2006 8:08 PM
Reply to: Message 4 by Hyroglyphx
11-04-2006 12:15 PM


Re: Theocracy :vs: Democracy
But your reply doesn't answer the question.
Why do Christian conservatives vote to support the death penalty, or vote to cut funding to programs to help the poor, or vote to go to war on a country that has never threatened or injured us, or vote to support business greed and wealth?
Why do they do that when it is so clearly counter to what even Faith has agreed are good Christian values?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 4 by Hyroglyphx, posted 11-04-2006 12:15 PM Hyroglyphx has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 55 by Hyroglyphx, posted 11-05-2006 1:45 PM nator has not replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2201 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 38 of 68 (361649)
11-04-2006 8:11 PM
Reply to: Message 8 by mike the wiz
11-04-2006 1:12 PM


OK, how about if I said that Jesus held values in common with what we would call "social Liberals" today?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 8 by mike the wiz, posted 11-04-2006 1:12 PM mike the wiz has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 59 by mike the wiz, posted 11-05-2006 5:33 PM nator has replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2201 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 39 of 68 (361651)
11-04-2006 8:18 PM
Reply to: Message 12 by Buzsaw
11-04-2006 4:03 PM


Re: Christians Impose No Laws
quote:
1. The issues you cite are issues at large and not limited to Christians. For example gay marriage may be banned in some totalitarian anit-Christian nations and are banned as I understand.
True, but in the US, it's the Christian Conservatives who are behind the interference, for no valid secular reason.
Most people in the US support it, just as most people in the US support a woman's right to an abortion.
quote:
2. All governments impose laws. In a democratic republic such as ours the people choose who gets into government position to impose laws. So when the electorate votes, regardless of ideology, the electorate at large decides who will impose laws. Gays likely will support their agendas and evangelicals theirs. Ultimately Christians perse impose no laws. Elected officials do that. We all work in the system to advance our ideological agendas.
Except that you are forgetting the Bill of Rights and the Constitution.
quote:
3. The majority way back in Jefferson's day in fact voted for this president who had church services in the halls of congress and decided that the marine band would be nice for the music in those services. Magin that. Nowadays the majority wouldn't think of such a thing.
Right. I don't get your point.
quote:
4. So madear, do the American thing that's been done for 200+ years. Get out, root for and vote for folks who impose laws you want imposed and who refrain from imposing others. I and my Biblicalist fellow citizens will do the same.
Oh, don't worry about that.
But again, your laws have to abide by the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 12 by Buzsaw, posted 11-04-2006 4:03 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2201 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 40 of 68 (361652)
11-04-2006 8:22 PM
Reply to: Message 14 by Buzsaw
11-04-2006 4:10 PM


Re: Theocracy :vs: Democracy
quote:
When then does the alleged theocracy get the Bible back in government schools as it was for over a century before the secularists took over?
Do you want the state religion of the US to be Christianity, buz?
Do you want a Theocracy?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 14 by Buzsaw, posted 11-04-2006 4:10 PM Buzsaw has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 44 by MangyTiger, posted 11-04-2006 8:44 PM nator has not replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2201 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 41 of 68 (361655)
11-04-2006 8:26 PM
Reply to: Message 20 by Buzsaw
11-04-2006 5:14 PM


Re: Theocracy :vs: Democracy
quote:
It's unfortunate for us who's priviledges are forbidden by imposition of the majority electorate.
So, you people think you ever had the right to indoctrinate all American schoolchildren into your religion?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 20 by Buzsaw, posted 11-04-2006 5:14 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2201 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 42 of 68 (361657)
11-04-2006 8:29 PM
Reply to: Message 22 by Buzsaw
11-04-2006 5:33 PM


Re: Christians Impose No Laws
Buz.
Read the Jefferson quote in my sig file.

"Science is like a blabbermouth who ruins a movie by telling you how it ends! Well I say there are some things we don't want to know! Important things!"
- Ned Flanders
"Question with boldness even the existence of God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason than that of blindfolded fear." - Thomas Jefferson

This message is a reply to:
 Message 22 by Buzsaw, posted 11-04-2006 5:33 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2201 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 43 of 68 (361658)
11-04-2006 8:37 PM
Reply to: Message 31 by iano
11-04-2006 6:34 PM


quote:
Christians are in a pickle.
They want the kingdom to come - for all goodness comes with it.
Yet seeing as Gods laws being broken is an integral part of a person being convinced they are lawbreakers (which is instrumental in their salvation) all that upholds Gods law (such a no gay marriage) seems to work counter-salvation.
You could understand that we can be two-minded about such things. Not wanting people to be allowed freefall into sin. Yet realising that the depravity of sin is their only hope. Parents experience it: you have to let go but you don't want to let go.
But this doesn't address my question.
I wanted to know why it was that Christians are all gung-ho to get some of their religious views imposed upon everyone else by force of law, but not others.
Why don't they try to enforce Jesus' attitude towards the greed and wealth of businesses, or his admonition to take care of the poor, or his lessons regarding how we should treat our enemies?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 31 by iano, posted 11-04-2006 6:34 PM iano has not replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2201 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 53 of 68 (361791)
11-05-2006 6:17 AM
Reply to: Message 47 by Buzsaw
11-04-2006 11:37 PM


Re: Theocracy :vs: Democracy
quote:
I don't believe I said secularism imposes itself on religion. I said secularists work towards their interests as do Christians to have imposed laws they support passed by government.
Buz, if you like the fact that the US enjoyes freedom of religion for all of it's citizens, the you should be supporting the secularists. It is the secularists, buz, who support freedom of religious expression for all, not the Christian Right.
If you support the current representation of the Christian Right, you are supporting people who wish to impose partial or complete Theocracy.
The Christian Right wishes to make their religious views into law.
Can't you see that this is wrong?
Edited by schrafinator, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 47 by Buzsaw, posted 11-04-2006 11:37 PM Buzsaw has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 54 by jar, posted 11-05-2006 12:05 PM nator has not replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2201 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 62 of 68 (362023)
11-05-2006 8:57 PM
Reply to: Message 59 by mike the wiz
11-05-2006 5:33 PM


Christ smashed up the money lender tables in the tmple.
He also was builled as the warrior king who was to lead Israel to a military civtory over it's enemies.
I'd say that's pretty political.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 59 by mike the wiz, posted 11-05-2006 5:33 PM mike the wiz has not replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2201 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 65 of 68 (362131)
11-06-2006 11:04 AM
Reply to: Message 63 by Buzsaw
11-06-2006 9:14 AM


Re: Theocracy :vs: Democracy
quote:
The implications in this thread made that we less secularist Christians want a theocracy is false in that it's government that imposes laws and we all work to promote laws more suited to our ideology.
Again, buz, if you like the fact that all citizens of the US enjoy freedom of religious expression, then you should be supporting the secularists.
Why do you think it's OK for people to pass laws which would, by law, impose their religious views on you?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 63 by Buzsaw, posted 11-06-2006 9:14 AM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024